General lexical slowing and the semantic priming effect: The roles of age and ability

Joel Myerson, Sandra Hale, Jing Chen, Bonnie Lawrence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Older adults performed three lexical information-processing tasks approximately 1.3 times slower than young adults. Consistent with general lexical slowing, slopes of regressions based on individual subjects' RTs on two of the tasks (single lexical decision and category judgment) did not differ from slopes based on the third (double lexical decision) task. Moreover, slopes based on the single lexical decision and category judgment tasks accurately predicted the size of semantic priming effects on the third (double lexical decision) task. This was true for the older group as a whole, and also for subgroups of fast, medium and slow older adults, as well as for young adult subgroups. The size of the semantic priming effects for the fast old and slow young subgroups (who differed in age but not in processing speed) were approximately equal, consistent with the idea that the effect of age on priming is entirely attributable to slowing. Across all tasks, each old subgroup (fast, medium, or slow) showed the same degree of slowing relative to the corresponding young subgroup, so that the differences in RTs observed between subgroups in the young sample were magnified in the old sample. Taken together, the present findings suggest that ability-related differences in lexical processing speed may be functionally equivalent to age-related differences and that both factors interact to determine performance on speeded lexical tasks.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-101
Number of pages19
JournalActa Psychologica
Volume96
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1997

Keywords

  • Cognitive aging
  • General slowing
  • Semantic priming

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'General lexical slowing and the semantic priming effect: The roles of age and ability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this