TY - JOUR
T1 - Gender Differences in Clinical Practice and Medicare Reimbursement Among Mohs Surgeons
AU - Motosko, Catherine C.
AU - Waldman, Abigail
AU - Stevenson, Mary L.
AU - Council, M. Laurin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc.
PY - 2023/5/1
Y1 - 2023/5/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate Medicare reimbursement and clinical activity between male and female dermatologic surgeons. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment data from 2018 was performed for all dermatologists performing MMS. Provider gender, place of service, number of services, and average payment per service was recorded for all relevant procedure codes. Results: Women represented 31.5% of the 2,581 surgeons who performed MMS in 2018. Women were paid significantly less than men (mean difference, -$73,033). On average, women performed 123 fewer cases than their male counterparts. When surgeons were stratified by productivity, remuneration was the same. Conclusion: Remuneration from CMS was disparate between male and female dermatologic surgeons, which may be attributed to submission of fewer charges by women. Further efforts are necessary to better evaluate and address causes for this discrepancy, because greater parity of opportunity and pay would greatly benefit this subspecialty of dermatology.
AB - Objective: To evaluate Medicare reimbursement and clinical activity between male and female dermatologic surgeons. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment data from 2018 was performed for all dermatologists performing MMS. Provider gender, place of service, number of services, and average payment per service was recorded for all relevant procedure codes. Results: Women represented 31.5% of the 2,581 surgeons who performed MMS in 2018. Women were paid significantly less than men (mean difference, -$73,033). On average, women performed 123 fewer cases than their male counterparts. When surgeons were stratified by productivity, remuneration was the same. Conclusion: Remuneration from CMS was disparate between male and female dermatologic surgeons, which may be attributed to submission of fewer charges by women. Further efforts are necessary to better evaluate and address causes for this discrepancy, because greater parity of opportunity and pay would greatly benefit this subspecialty of dermatology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85158895551&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003743
DO - 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003743
M3 - Article
C2 - 36877102
AN - SCOPUS:85158895551
SN - 1076-0512
VL - 49
SP - 462
EP - 465
JO - Dermatologic Surgery
JF - Dermatologic Surgery
IS - 5
ER -