TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional outcomes of tibialis posterior tendoscopy with comparison to magnetic resonance imaging
AU - Gianakos, Arianna L.
AU - Ross, Keir A.
AU - Hannon, Charles P.
AU - Duke, Gavin L.
AU - Prado, Marcelo P.
AU - Kennedy, John G.
N1 - Funding Information:
John G. Kennedy, MD, FRCS (Orth), is a consultant for Arteriocyte, Inc; received research support from the Ohnell Family Foundation, Mr. and Mrs. Michael J Levitt, Arteriocyte Inc; and is a board member for the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) and International Society for Cartilage Repair of the Ankle (ISCRA).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Author(s).
PY - 2015/7/11
Y1 - 2015/7/11
N2 - Background: The purpose of the current study was to report functional outcomes of tendoscopy for treatment of tibialis posterior tendon pathology as well as compare its diagnostic capability with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: Clinical records and MRI of 12 patients who underwent tendoscopy of the tibialis posterior tendon (TPT) were retrospectively reviewed. Mean follow-up was 31 months (range, 26-43 months). Preoperative MRI findings were compared with tendoscopic findings to assess the diagnostic agreement between each modality. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) General Health Questionnaire preand postoperatively. Mean patient age was 43 years (range, 17-63 years). Mean duration of preoperative symptoms was 15.5 months (range, 3-36 months). Results: Pathologies addressed via tendoscopy included tenosynovitis, tendinosis, stenosis, tendon subluxation, and partial thickness tear (via mini-arthrotomy). Preoperative MRI findings were in agreement with tendoscopic findings in 8 of 12 cases (67%). Tendoscopy diagnosed and allowed access for treating pathology that was missed on MRI in the remaining four cases. The FAOS improved from a mean preoperative score of 58 (range, 36-78) to a mean postoperative score of 81 (range, 44-98) (P < .01). The SF-12 score improved from a mean preoperative score of 34 (range, 13-51) to a mean postoperative score of 51 (range, 21-76) (P = .01). Conclusions: Although MRI is considered an effective imaging technique for tendon pathology, tendoscopy may be a more sensitive diagnostic tool. Tendoscopy was an effective minimally invasive tool to diagnose and treat tibialis posterior tendon pathology resulting in functional improvements in the short-term for early stage TPT dysfunction. Further studies comparing tendoscopy with traditional open approaches are warranted. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.
AB - Background: The purpose of the current study was to report functional outcomes of tendoscopy for treatment of tibialis posterior tendon pathology as well as compare its diagnostic capability with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: Clinical records and MRI of 12 patients who underwent tendoscopy of the tibialis posterior tendon (TPT) were retrospectively reviewed. Mean follow-up was 31 months (range, 26-43 months). Preoperative MRI findings were compared with tendoscopic findings to assess the diagnostic agreement between each modality. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Short Form-12 (SF-12) General Health Questionnaire preand postoperatively. Mean patient age was 43 years (range, 17-63 years). Mean duration of preoperative symptoms was 15.5 months (range, 3-36 months). Results: Pathologies addressed via tendoscopy included tenosynovitis, tendinosis, stenosis, tendon subluxation, and partial thickness tear (via mini-arthrotomy). Preoperative MRI findings were in agreement with tendoscopic findings in 8 of 12 cases (67%). Tendoscopy diagnosed and allowed access for treating pathology that was missed on MRI in the remaining four cases. The FAOS improved from a mean preoperative score of 58 (range, 36-78) to a mean postoperative score of 81 (range, 44-98) (P < .01). The SF-12 score improved from a mean preoperative score of 34 (range, 13-51) to a mean postoperative score of 51 (range, 21-76) (P = .01). Conclusions: Although MRI is considered an effective imaging technique for tendon pathology, tendoscopy may be a more sensitive diagnostic tool. Tendoscopy was an effective minimally invasive tool to diagnose and treat tibialis posterior tendon pathology resulting in functional improvements in the short-term for early stage TPT dysfunction. Further studies comparing tendoscopy with traditional open approaches are warranted. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.
KW - ankle
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - tendinosis
KW - tendoscopy
KW - Tibialis posterior tendon
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936996453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1071100715576485
DO - 10.1177/1071100715576485
M3 - Article
C2 - 25759276
AN - SCOPUS:84936996453
VL - 36
SP - 812
EP - 819
JO - Foot and Ankle International
JF - Foot and Ankle International
SN - 1071-1007
IS - 7
ER -