Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal

Anna N. Miller, Omesh Paul, Sreevathsa Boraiah, Robert J. Parker, David L. Helfet, Dean G. Lorich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

110 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Ankle fractures with a syndesmotic injury have historically been treated with syndesmotic screw fixation. We compared range of motion and functional outcomes' scores to assess patient benefit from syndesmotic screw and plate removal. Design: Level IV-case series. Setting: Level I-trauma center. Patients/Participants: Twenty-five consecutive patients with unstable ankle fractures and syndesmotic injury confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging. Intervention: Locked syndesmotic screws and plates were removed; functional outcomes and range of motion were measured before and after screw removal. Main Outcome Measurements: Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Olerud and Molander Ankle Score, and physical examination Results: There was a significant improvement in range of motion, Foot and Ankle Outcome, and Olerud and Molander Ankle scores at the immediate postoperative visit. This was not significantly changed at longer follow-up. There were no adverse events or complications in these patients. No patient had radiographic loss of syndesmotic reduction after screw removal. Conclusions: Locked screw and plate removal improved function both subjectively and objectively. Transsyndesmotic implant removal seems to assist improvements in the speed of rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-16
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of orthopaedic trauma
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Keywords

  • Ankle
  • FAOS
  • Olerud and Molander
  • Screw removal
  • Syndesmotic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this