TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional imaging in the follow-up of enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
T2 - Clinical usefulness and indications
AU - Merola, Elettra
AU - Pave, Marianne E.
AU - Panzuto, Francesco
AU - Capurso, Gabriele
AU - Cicchese, Noemi
AU - Rinke, Anja
AU - Gress, Thomas M.
AU - Iannicelli, Elsa
AU - Prosperi, Daniela
AU - Pizzichini, Patrizia
AU - Prasad, Vikas
AU - Kump, Patrizia
AU - Lipp, Rainer
AU - Partelli, Stefano
AU - Falconi, Massimo
AU - Wiedenmann, Bertram
AU - Fave, Gianfranco Delle
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Endocrine Society.
PY - 2017/5/1
Y1 - 2017/5/1
N2 - Context: Functional imaging tests (FITs) detecting somatostatin receptor expression [i.e., somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, 68Ga-DOTA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT)] have a pivotal role in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), although their indication during follow-up still needs to be clarified. Objective: Investigate the role of FITs after diagnosis of metastatic enteropancreatic NETs, identifying patients who might benefit from these exams. Design: Multicenter retrospective analysis of metastatic enteropancreatic NETs. Setting: Analysis of imaging tests performed between January 1995 and December 2015 in Rome, Berlin, Milan, Marburg, or Graz. Subjects: One hundred forty-three patients with metastatic pancreatic NETs and small intestine NETs, at least 2-year follow-up, and positive FITs. Interventions: Patients had received CT every 6 months (unless clinical conditions and tumor behavior required shorter intervals) and FIT every 12 months. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical usefulness of FITs, defined as changes in patient management (indication to biopsy, medical therapy, surgery, or further imaging tests) due only to FITs. Results: FITs affected management in 73.4% of patients, mostly when G2 vs G1 [odds ratio (OR), 2.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09 to 5.27;P= 0.03]. Changes were observed in a 12-month time frame especiallywith pancreatic NETs vs small intestine NETs (OR, 2.89; 95%CI, 1.09-7.67; P = 0.03) or metastases since diagnosis vs developed during follow-up (OR, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.43 to 11.17; P , 0.01). Conclusions: FITs used in addition to CT in the follow-up of stage IV enteropancreatic NETs improve patient management (especially for G2 tumors). Follow-up program should be tailored according to tumor features. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102: 1486-1494, 2017).
AB - Context: Functional imaging tests (FITs) detecting somatostatin receptor expression [i.e., somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, 68Ga-DOTA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT)] have a pivotal role in the diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), although their indication during follow-up still needs to be clarified. Objective: Investigate the role of FITs after diagnosis of metastatic enteropancreatic NETs, identifying patients who might benefit from these exams. Design: Multicenter retrospective analysis of metastatic enteropancreatic NETs. Setting: Analysis of imaging tests performed between January 1995 and December 2015 in Rome, Berlin, Milan, Marburg, or Graz. Subjects: One hundred forty-three patients with metastatic pancreatic NETs and small intestine NETs, at least 2-year follow-up, and positive FITs. Interventions: Patients had received CT every 6 months (unless clinical conditions and tumor behavior required shorter intervals) and FIT every 12 months. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical usefulness of FITs, defined as changes in patient management (indication to biopsy, medical therapy, surgery, or further imaging tests) due only to FITs. Results: FITs affected management in 73.4% of patients, mostly when G2 vs G1 [odds ratio (OR), 2.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09 to 5.27;P= 0.03]. Changes were observed in a 12-month time frame especiallywith pancreatic NETs vs small intestine NETs (OR, 2.89; 95%CI, 1.09-7.67; P = 0.03) or metastases since diagnosis vs developed during follow-up (OR, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.43 to 11.17; P , 0.01). Conclusions: FITs used in addition to CT in the follow-up of stage IV enteropancreatic NETs improve patient management (especially for G2 tumors). Follow-up program should be tailored according to tumor features. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102: 1486-1494, 2017).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019093726&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1210/jc.2016-3732
DO - 10.1210/jc.2016-3732
M3 - Article
C2 - 28324047
AN - SCOPUS:85019093726
SN - 0021-972X
VL - 102
SP - 1486
EP - 1494
JO - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
JF - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
IS - 5
ER -