Fructose toxicity: Is the science ready for public health actions?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations


Purpose of review: The assumption that fructose may be toxic and involved in the pathogenesis of noncommunicable diseases such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and even cancer has resulted in the call for public health action, such as introducing taxes on sweetened beverages. This review evaluates the scientific basis for such action. Recent findings: Although some studies hint towards some potential adverse effects of excessive fructose consumption especially when combined with excess energy intake, the results from clinical trials do not support a significant detrimental effect of fructose on metabolic health when consumed as part of a weight-maintaining diet in amounts consistent with the average-estimated fructose consumption in Western countries. However, definitive studies are missing. Summary: Public health policies to eliminate or limit fructose in the diet should be considered premature. Instead, efforts should be made to promote a healthy lifestyle that includes physical activity and nutritious foods while avoiding intake of excess calories until solid evidence to support action against fructose is available. Public health is almost certainly to benefit more from policies that are aimed at promoting what is known to be good than from policies that are prohibiting what is not (yet) known to be bad.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357-361
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2012


  • diabetes
  • fructose
  • hypertriglyceridemia
  • insulin resistance
  • nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
  • obesity
  • sugar


Dive into the research topics of 'Fructose toxicity: Is the science ready for public health actions?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this