TY - JOUR
T1 - Fructose consumption from different food sources and cardiometabolic biomarkers
T2 - cross-sectional associations in US men and women
AU - Li, Xinyi
AU - Joh, Hee Kyung
AU - Hur, Jinhee
AU - Song, Mingyang
AU - Zhang, Xuehong
AU - Cao, Yin
AU - Wu, Kana
AU - Giovannucci, Edward L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Society for Nutrition
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background: Previous studies on the relationship between fructose intake and cardiometabolic biomarkers have yielded inconsistent results, and the metabolic effects of fructose are likely to vary across food sources such as fruit versus sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB). Objectives: We aimed to examine associations of fructose from 3 major sources (SSB, fruit juice, and fruit) with 14 insulinemic/glycemic, inflammatory, and lipid markers. Methods: We utilized cross-sectional data from 6858 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, 15,400 women in NHS, and 19,456 women in NHSII who were free of type 2 diabetes, CVDs, and cancer at blood draw. Fructose intake was assessed via a validated FFQ. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate the percentage differences of biomarker concentrations according to fructose intake. Results: We found a 20 g/d increase in total fructose intake was associated with 1.5%– 1.9% higher concentrations of proinflammatory markers plus 3.5% lower adiponectin, as well as 5.9% higher TG/HDL cholesterol ratio. Unfavorable profiles of most biomarkers were only associated with fructose from SSB and juice. In contrast, fruit fructose was associated with lower concentrations of C-peptide, CRP, IL-6, leptin, and total cholesterol. Substituting 20 g/d fruit fructose for SSB fructose was associated with 10.1% lower C-peptide, 2.7%–14.5% lower proinflammatory markers and 1.8%–5.2% lower blood lipids. Conclusions: Beverage fructose intake was associated with adverse profiles of multiple cardiometabolic biomarkers.
AB - Background: Previous studies on the relationship between fructose intake and cardiometabolic biomarkers have yielded inconsistent results, and the metabolic effects of fructose are likely to vary across food sources such as fruit versus sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB). Objectives: We aimed to examine associations of fructose from 3 major sources (SSB, fruit juice, and fruit) with 14 insulinemic/glycemic, inflammatory, and lipid markers. Methods: We utilized cross-sectional data from 6858 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, 15,400 women in NHS, and 19,456 women in NHSII who were free of type 2 diabetes, CVDs, and cancer at blood draw. Fructose intake was assessed via a validated FFQ. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate the percentage differences of biomarker concentrations according to fructose intake. Results: We found a 20 g/d increase in total fructose intake was associated with 1.5%– 1.9% higher concentrations of proinflammatory markers plus 3.5% lower adiponectin, as well as 5.9% higher TG/HDL cholesterol ratio. Unfavorable profiles of most biomarkers were only associated with fructose from SSB and juice. In contrast, fruit fructose was associated with lower concentrations of C-peptide, CRP, IL-6, leptin, and total cholesterol. Substituting 20 g/d fruit fructose for SSB fructose was associated with 10.1% lower C-peptide, 2.7%–14.5% lower proinflammatory markers and 1.8%–5.2% lower blood lipids. Conclusions: Beverage fructose intake was associated with adverse profiles of multiple cardiometabolic biomarkers.
KW - fructose
KW - fruit
KW - fruit juice
KW - glycemic control
KW - inflammation
KW - insulin
KW - lipids
KW - sugar-sweetened beverages
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149999690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.01.006
DO - 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.01.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 36811469
AN - SCOPUS:85149999690
SN - 0002-9165
VL - 117
SP - 490
EP - 498
JO - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
JF - American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
IS - 3
ER -