From "Gay Marriage Controversy" (2004) to "Endorsement of Same-Sex Marriage" (2012): Framing Bisexuality in the Marriage Equality Discourse

  • Andrea M. Hackl
  • , C. Reyn Boyer
  • , M. Paz Galupo

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    48 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The current study analyzes the evolution of language used to discuss marriage equality in The New York Times between February and May 2004 and February and May 2012. Specifically, the study examines how sexual orientation labels were used as modifiers for "marriage," "couples," and "individuals." Results indicate that the language evolved from a focus on the sexual orientation label gay in 2004 to a more inclusive language, with same-sex as the predominant modifier for marriage and couples in 2012. Further, while the overall language in The New York Times became more inclusive of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender community at large, bisexual women and men are still largely absent within the marriage equality discourse.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)512-524
    Number of pages13
    JournalSexuality and Culture
    Volume17
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2013

    Keywords

    • Bisexuality
    • Gay marriage
    • Marriage equality
    • New York Times
    • Same-sex marriage
    • Sexual orientation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'From "Gay Marriage Controversy" (2004) to "Endorsement of Same-Sex Marriage" (2012): Framing Bisexuality in the Marriage Equality Discourse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this