Abstract
Empirical study of free will is directly related to the study of the control of human behavior. This chapter discusses four cognitive research paradigms, as well as their implications for the study of free will. Libet's investigations of the neural precursors of conscious choice provide evidence challenging the primacy of conscious thought. Studies using Logan's stop-signal paradigm demonstrate the capacity to inhibit simple, even habitual, actions. Research using Jacoby's process dissociation procedure (PDP) suggests that human behavior may be influenced by both automatic and controlled processes. The use of Koriat and Goldsmith's free and forced reporting procedure demonstrates how control may be exercised over both the accuracy and specificity of responses in cognitive tasks. All four paradigms show that humans can exert at least partial control over their actions, especially through inhibition. However, whether such control is evidence for the existence of free will may never be answered.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Are We Free? |
| Subtitle of host publication | Psychology and Free Will |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780199868605 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780195189636 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 20 2008 |
Keywords
- Automatic processes
- Controlled processes
- Forced report
- Free report
- Inhibition
- Process dissociation procedure
- Stop-signal paradigm