Free Will and the Control of Action

  • Henry L. Roediger
  • , Michael K. Goode
  • , Franklin M. Zaromb

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Empirical study of free will is directly related to the study of the control of human behavior. This chapter discusses four cognitive research paradigms, as well as their implications for the study of free will. Libet's investigations of the neural precursors of conscious choice provide evidence challenging the primacy of conscious thought. Studies using Logan's stop-signal paradigm demonstrate the capacity to inhibit simple, even habitual, actions. Research using Jacoby's process dissociation procedure (PDP) suggests that human behavior may be influenced by both automatic and controlled processes. The use of Koriat and Goldsmith's free and forced reporting procedure demonstrates how control may be exercised over both the accuracy and specificity of responses in cognitive tasks. All four paradigms show that humans can exert at least partial control over their actions, especially through inhibition. However, whether such control is evidence for the existence of free will may never be answered.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAre We Free?
Subtitle of host publicationPsychology and Free Will
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780199868605
ISBN (Print)9780195189636
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 20 2008

Keywords

  • Automatic processes
  • Controlled processes
  • Forced report
  • Free report
  • Inhibition
  • Process dissociation procedure
  • Stop-signal paradigm

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Free Will and the Control of Action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this