Fixed dynamometry is more sensitive than vital capacity or ALS rating scale

  • Patricia L. Andres
  • , Margaret Peggy Allred
  • , Helen E. Stephens
  • , Mary Proffitt Bunnell
  • , Catherine Siener
  • , Eric A. Macklin
  • , Travis Haines
  • , Robert A. English
  • , Katherine A. Fetterman
  • , Edward J. Kasarskis
  • , Julaine Florence
  • , Zachary Simmons
  • , Merit E. Cudkowicz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Improved outcome measures are essential to efficiently screen the growing number of potential amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapies. Methods: This longitudinal study of 100 (70 male) participants with ALS compared Accurate Test of Limb Isometric Strength (ATLIS), using a fixed, wireless load cell, with ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) and vital capacity (VC). Results: Participants enrolled at 5 U.S. sites. Data were analyzed from 66 participants with complete ATLIS, ALSFRS-R, and VC data over at least 3 visits. Change in ATLIS was less variable both within- and among-person than change in ALSFRS-R or VC. Additionally, participants who had normal ALSFRS-R arm and leg function averaged 12 to 32% below expected strength values measured by ATLIS. Conclusions: ATLIS was more sensitive to change than ALSFRS-R or VC and could decrease sample size requirements by approximately one-third. The ability of ATLIS to detect prefunctional change has potential value in early trials. Muscle Nerve 56: 710–715, 2017.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)710-715
Number of pages6
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume56
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017

Keywords

  • ALS
  • ALSFRS-R
  • longitudinal
  • outcome measure
  • strength
  • vital capacity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fixed dynamometry is more sensitive than vital capacity or ALS rating scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this