Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Five-year follow up of thymoglobulin versus ATGAM induction in adult renal transplantation

  • Karen L. Hardinger
  • , Mark A. Schnitzler
  • , Brent Miller
  • , Jeffrey A. Lowell
  • , Surendra Shenoy
  • , Matthew J. Koch
  • , Decha Enkvetchakul
  • , Connie Ceriotti
  • , Daniel C. Brennan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background. One-year results of a randomized, double-blinded trial of Thymoglobulin versus Atgam for induction therapy in renal transplantation revealed that Thymoglobulin was associated with higher event-free survival (94% vs. 63%), less acute rejection (4% vs. 25%), and better graft survival. This article compares the safety and efficacy of Thymoglobulin versus Atgam induction through 5 years. Methods. Review and analysis of clinic records and electronic databases. Results. At 5 years, event-free survival (73% vs. 33%, P<0.001), graft survival (77% vs. 55%, P=0.047), and freedom from rejection (92% vs. 66%, P=0.007) were higher with Thymoglobulin versus Atgam. No additional cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease occurred after the first year with Thymoglobulin or Atgam (13% vs. 33%, P=0.056). There were two cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) with the Atgam arm and none with Thymoglobulin. Thymoglobulin was associated with profound lymphopenia at 2 years after transplantation. Conclusions. Thymoglobulin was associated with higher event-free survival, graft survival, and freedom from rejection without increased PTLD or CMV disease at 5 years compared with Atgam. The prolonged and profound lymphopenia may contribute to the long-term results associated with Thymoglobulin.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)136-141
Number of pages6
JournalTransplantation
Volume78
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Five-year follow up of thymoglobulin versus ATGAM induction in adult renal transplantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this