First trimester chorionic villus sampling versus mid‐trimester genetic amniocentesis‐preliminary results of a controlled prospective trial

James P. Crane, Heidi A. Beaver, Sau Wai Cheung

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    This controlled prospective study assesses the relative risks of first trimester chorionic villus sampling (CVS) versus mid‐trimester gentic amniocentesis (GA). CVS subjects and amnio‐centesis controls were comparable with regard to several confounding variables which might influence the risk of pregnancy loss including maternal age, smoking, alcohol consumption, gestational age at study entry, and history of vaginal bleeding or poor prior reproductive outcome. The most common indication for prenatal diagnosis was advanced maternal age (n = 511). In this subgroup, spontaneous abortion (<24 weeks) occurred in 2·9 per cent of CVS subjects versus 4−3 per cent of amniocentesis controls. The sum of spontaneous and therapeutic abortions (<24 weeks) was identical (5·3 per cent) in both groups. Therefore, intervention in the CVS group (i.e., therapeutic abortion for cytogenetic abnormalities) did not influence the observed risk of pregnancy loss. Overall perinatal mortality rates were also similar in both groups. No significant differences were identified for a number of pregnancy outcome parameters including 5 min Apgar score, birth weight, body length, head circumference, gestational age at delivery, preterm delivery, fetal growth retardation, congenital malformations, and neonatal complications. Preliminary results of this controlled prospective study suggest that chorionic villus sampling carries a low and acceptable risk.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)355-366
    Number of pages12
    JournalPrenatal Diagnosis
    Volume8
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 1988

    Keywords

    • Chorionic villus sampling
    • Genetic amniocentesis
    • Prenatal diagnosis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'First trimester chorionic villus sampling versus mid‐trimester genetic amniocentesis‐preliminary results of a controlled prospective trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this