TY - JOUR
T1 - Finite element models of flagella with sliding radial spokes and interdoublet links exhibit propagating waves under steady dynein loading
AU - Hu, Tianchen
AU - Bayly, Philip V.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this work was provided by NSF grants CMMI-1265447 and CMMI-1633971, and by the Children's Discovery Institute of Washington University and St. Louis Children's Hospital.
Funding Information:
NSF grants, Grant Numbers: CMMI-1265447 and CMMI-1633971; Children’s Discovery Institute of Washington University and St. Louis Children’s Hospital.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - It remains unclear how flagella generate propulsive, oscillatory waveforms. While it is well known that dynein motors, in combination with passive cytoskeletal elements, drive the bending of the axoneme by applying shearing forces and bending moments to microtubule doublets, the origin of rhythmicity is still mysterious. Most conceptual models of flagellar oscillation involve dynein regulation or switching, so that dynein activity first on one side of the axoneme, then the other, drives bending. In contrast, a “viscoelastic flutter” mechanism has recently been proposed, based on a dynamic structural instability. Simple mathematical models of coupled elastic beams in viscous fluid, subjected to steady, axially distributed, dynein forces of sufficient magnitude, can exhibit oscillatory motion without any switching or dynamic regulation. Here we introduce more realistic finite element (FE) models of 6-doublet and 9-doublet flagella, with radial spokes and interdoublet links that slide along the central pair or corresponding doublet. These models demonstrate the viscoelastic flutter mechanism. Above a critical force threshold, these models exhibit an abrupt onset of propulsive, wavelike oscillations typical of flutter instability. Changes in the magnitude and spatial distribution of steady dynein force, or to viscous resistance, lead to behavior qualitatively consistent with experimental observations. This study demonstrates the ability of FE models to simulate nonlinear interactions between axonemal components during flagellar beating, and supports the plausibility of viscoelastic flutter as a mechanism of flagellar oscillation.
AB - It remains unclear how flagella generate propulsive, oscillatory waveforms. While it is well known that dynein motors, in combination with passive cytoskeletal elements, drive the bending of the axoneme by applying shearing forces and bending moments to microtubule doublets, the origin of rhythmicity is still mysterious. Most conceptual models of flagellar oscillation involve dynein regulation or switching, so that dynein activity first on one side of the axoneme, then the other, drives bending. In contrast, a “viscoelastic flutter” mechanism has recently been proposed, based on a dynamic structural instability. Simple mathematical models of coupled elastic beams in viscous fluid, subjected to steady, axially distributed, dynein forces of sufficient magnitude, can exhibit oscillatory motion without any switching or dynamic regulation. Here we introduce more realistic finite element (FE) models of 6-doublet and 9-doublet flagella, with radial spokes and interdoublet links that slide along the central pair or corresponding doublet. These models demonstrate the viscoelastic flutter mechanism. Above a critical force threshold, these models exhibit an abrupt onset of propulsive, wavelike oscillations typical of flutter instability. Changes in the magnitude and spatial distribution of steady dynein force, or to viscous resistance, lead to behavior qualitatively consistent with experimental observations. This study demonstrates the ability of FE models to simulate nonlinear interactions between axonemal components during flagellar beating, and supports the plausibility of viscoelastic flutter as a mechanism of flagellar oscillation.
KW - axoneme
KW - flagella
KW - flutter
KW - instability
KW - oscillations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040740245&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cm.21432
DO - 10.1002/cm.21432
M3 - Article
C2 - 29316355
AN - SCOPUS:85040740245
SN - 1949-3584
VL - 75
SP - 185
EP - 200
JO - Cytoskeleton
JF - Cytoskeleton
IS - 5
ER -