TY - JOUR
T1 - Finger tapping as a proxy for gait
T2 - Similar effects on movement variability during external and self-generated cueing in people with Parkinson's disease and healthy older adults
AU - Horin, Adam P.
AU - Harrison, Elinor C.
AU - Rawson, Kerri S.
AU - Earhart, Gammon M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Background: Rhythmic auditory cueing has been widely studied for gait rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease (PD). Our research group previously showed that externally generated cues (i.e., music) increased gait variability measures from uncued gait, whereas self-generated cues (i.e., mental singing) did not. These different effects may be due to differences in underlying neural mechanisms that could be discerned via neuroimaging; however, movement types that can be studied with neuroimaging are limited. Objective: The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of different cue types on gait, finger tapping, and foot tapping, to determine whether tapping can be used as a surrogate for gait in future neuroimaging studies. The secondary aim of this study was to investigate whether rhythm skills or auditory imagery abilities are associated with responses to these different cue types. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, controls (n = 24) and individuals with PD (n = 33) performed gait, finger tapping, and foot tapping at their preferred pace (UNCUED) and to externally generated (MUSIC) and self-generated (MENTAL) cues. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait and temporal parameters of finger tapping and foot tapping were collected. The Beat Alignment Task (BAT) and Bucknell Auditory Imagery Scale (BAIS) were also administered. Results: The MUSIC cues elicited higher movement variability than did MENTAL cues across all movements. The MUSIC cues also elicited higher movement variability than the UNCUED condition for gait and finger tapping. Conclusions: This study shows that different cue types affect gait and finger tapping similarly. Finger tapping may be an adequate proxy for gait in studying the underlying neural mechanisms of these cue types.
AB - Background: Rhythmic auditory cueing has been widely studied for gait rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease (PD). Our research group previously showed that externally generated cues (i.e., music) increased gait variability measures from uncued gait, whereas self-generated cues (i.e., mental singing) did not. These different effects may be due to differences in underlying neural mechanisms that could be discerned via neuroimaging; however, movement types that can be studied with neuroimaging are limited. Objective: The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of different cue types on gait, finger tapping, and foot tapping, to determine whether tapping can be used as a surrogate for gait in future neuroimaging studies. The secondary aim of this study was to investigate whether rhythm skills or auditory imagery abilities are associated with responses to these different cue types. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, controls (n = 24) and individuals with PD (n = 33) performed gait, finger tapping, and foot tapping at their preferred pace (UNCUED) and to externally generated (MUSIC) and self-generated (MENTAL) cues. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait and temporal parameters of finger tapping and foot tapping were collected. The Beat Alignment Task (BAT) and Bucknell Auditory Imagery Scale (BAIS) were also administered. Results: The MUSIC cues elicited higher movement variability than did MENTAL cues across all movements. The MUSIC cues also elicited higher movement variability than the UNCUED condition for gait and finger tapping. Conclusions: This study shows that different cue types affect gait and finger tapping similarly. Finger tapping may be an adequate proxy for gait in studying the underlying neural mechanisms of these cue types.
KW - Auditory cues
KW - Gait
KW - Parkinson's
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Tapping
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088137834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.05.009
DO - 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.05.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 32535169
AN - SCOPUS:85088137834
SN - 1877-0657
VL - 64
JO - Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
JF - Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
IS - 4
M1 - 101402
ER -