Fighting Fiscal Awkwardness: How Relationship Strength Changes Individuals’ Communication Approach When Resolving Interpersonal Debt

  • Alexander B. Park
  • , Cynthia Cryder
  • , Rachel Gershon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Social interactions can be uncomfortable. The current research focuses on a particularly uneasy interaction that individuals face with their friends and acquaintances: the need to request owed money back. Nine preregistered studies (N = 6,953) show that individuals’ approach to resolving interpersonal debt varies based on their closeness with the requestee. Specifically, people prefer communication methods low in social richness (e.g., digital apps) when requesting money back from weak social connections such as distant acquaintances. However, they prefer communication methods high in social richness (e.g., in-person interactions) when requesting money back from strong social connections such as close friends. Process evidence reveals the psychological dynamics at play: (a) people anticipate discomfort when requesting money back from distant acquaintances in person, driving them away from in-person requests and toward digital apps, and (b) people are more averse to appearing impersonal with close friends, driving them away from digital apps and toward in-person requests. In sum, individuals adaptively approach uncomfortable financial interactions based on the relationship dynamics at hand.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)152-170
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
    Volume154
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 7 2024

    Keywords

    • communication richness
    • digital communication
    • interpersonal debt
    • relationships
    • social discomfort

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Fighting Fiscal Awkwardness: How Relationship Strength Changes Individuals’ Communication Approach When Resolving Interpersonal Debt'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this