Factors Influencing Maintenance of Alignment and Functional Improvement Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A 3-Year Outcome Analysis

Peter G. Passias, Lara Passfall, Kevin Moattari, Oscar Krol, Nicholas A. Kummer, Peter Tretiakov, Tyler Williamson, Rachel Joujon-Roche, Bailey Imbo, Muhammad Burhan Janjua, Pawel Jankowski, Carl Paulino, Frank J. Schwab, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Vivek Singh, Salman Ahmad, Tobi Onafowokan, Jordan Lebovic, Muhammad Tariq, Hesham SalehShaleen Vira, Justin S. Smith, Bassel Diebo, Andrew J. Schoenfeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Design. This was a retrospective review. Objective. To assess the factors contributing to durability of surgical results following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Summary of Background. Factors contributing to the long-term sustainability of ASD correction are currently undefined. Materials and Methods. Operative ASD patients with preoperatively (baseline) and 3-year postoperatively radiographic/health-related quality of life data were included. At 1 and 3 years postoperatively, a favorable outcome was defined as meeting at least three of four criteria: (1) no proximal junctional failure or mechanical failure with reoperation, (2) best clinical outcome (BCO) for Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) (≥4.5) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (<15), (3) improving in at least one SRS-Schwab modifier, and (4) not worsening in any SRS-Schwab modifier. A robust surgical result was defined as having a favorable outcome at both 1 and 3 years. Predictors of robust outcomes were identified using multivariable regression analysis with conditional inference tree for continuous variables. Results. We included 157 ASD patients in this analysis. At 1 year postoperatively, 62 patients (39.5%) met the BCO definition for ODI and 33 (21.0%) met the BCO for SRS. At 3 years, 58 patients (36.9%) had BCO for ODI and 29 (18.5%) for SRS. Ninety-five patients (60.5%) were identified as having a favorable outcome at 1 year postoperatively. At 3 years, 85 patients (54.1%) had a favorable outcome. Seventy-eight patients (49.7%) met criteria for a durable surgical result. Multivariable adjusted analysis identified the following independent predictors of surgical durability: surgical invasiveness >65, being fused to S1/pelvis, baseline to 6-week pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis difference >13.9°, and having a proportional Global Alignment and Proportion score at 6 weeks. Conclusions. Nearly 50% of the ASD cohort demonstrated good surgical durability, with favorable radiographic alignment and functional status maintained up to 3 years. Surgical durability was more likely in patients whose reconstruction was fused to the pelvis and addressed lumbopelvic mismatch with adequate surgical invasiveness to achieve full alignment correction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)90-96
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2024

Keywords

  • adult spinal deformity
  • durability
  • fusion
  • kyphosis
  • spine
  • surgical outcomes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Factors Influencing Maintenance of Alignment and Functional Improvement Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A 3-Year Outcome Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this