TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors Influencing Maintenance of Alignment and Functional Improvement Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
T2 - A 3-Year Outcome Analysis
AU - Passias, Peter G.
AU - Passfall, Lara
AU - Moattari, Kevin
AU - Krol, Oscar
AU - Kummer, Nicholas A.
AU - Tretiakov, Peter
AU - Williamson, Tyler
AU - Joujon-Roche, Rachel
AU - Imbo, Bailey
AU - Burhan Janjua, Muhammad
AU - Jankowski, Pawel
AU - Paulino, Carl
AU - Schwab, Frank J.
AU - Owusu-Sarpong, Stephane
AU - Singh, Vivek
AU - Ahmad, Salman
AU - Onafowokan, Tobi
AU - Lebovic, Jordan
AU - Tariq, Muhammad
AU - Saleh, Hesham
AU - Vira, Shaleen
AU - Smith, Justin S.
AU - Diebo, Bassel
AU - Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/1/15
Y1 - 2024/1/15
N2 - Study Design. This was a retrospective review. Objective. To assess the factors contributing to durability of surgical results following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Summary of Background. Factors contributing to the long-term sustainability of ASD correction are currently undefined. Materials and Methods. Operative ASD patients with preoperatively (baseline) and 3-year postoperatively radiographic/health-related quality of life data were included. At 1 and 3 years postoperatively, a favorable outcome was defined as meeting at least three of four criteria: (1) no proximal junctional failure or mechanical failure with reoperation, (2) best clinical outcome (BCO) for Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) (≥4.5) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (<15), (3) improving in at least one SRS-Schwab modifier, and (4) not worsening in any SRS-Schwab modifier. A robust surgical result was defined as having a favorable outcome at both 1 and 3 years. Predictors of robust outcomes were identified using multivariable regression analysis with conditional inference tree for continuous variables. Results. We included 157 ASD patients in this analysis. At 1 year postoperatively, 62 patients (39.5%) met the BCO definition for ODI and 33 (21.0%) met the BCO for SRS. At 3 years, 58 patients (36.9%) had BCO for ODI and 29 (18.5%) for SRS. Ninety-five patients (60.5%) were identified as having a favorable outcome at 1 year postoperatively. At 3 years, 85 patients (54.1%) had a favorable outcome. Seventy-eight patients (49.7%) met criteria for a durable surgical result. Multivariable adjusted analysis identified the following independent predictors of surgical durability: surgical invasiveness >65, being fused to S1/pelvis, baseline to 6-week pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis difference >13.9°, and having a proportional Global Alignment and Proportion score at 6 weeks. Conclusions. Nearly 50% of the ASD cohort demonstrated good surgical durability, with favorable radiographic alignment and functional status maintained up to 3 years. Surgical durability was more likely in patients whose reconstruction was fused to the pelvis and addressed lumbopelvic mismatch with adequate surgical invasiveness to achieve full alignment correction.
AB - Study Design. This was a retrospective review. Objective. To assess the factors contributing to durability of surgical results following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Summary of Background. Factors contributing to the long-term sustainability of ASD correction are currently undefined. Materials and Methods. Operative ASD patients with preoperatively (baseline) and 3-year postoperatively radiographic/health-related quality of life data were included. At 1 and 3 years postoperatively, a favorable outcome was defined as meeting at least three of four criteria: (1) no proximal junctional failure or mechanical failure with reoperation, (2) best clinical outcome (BCO) for Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) (≥4.5) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (<15), (3) improving in at least one SRS-Schwab modifier, and (4) not worsening in any SRS-Schwab modifier. A robust surgical result was defined as having a favorable outcome at both 1 and 3 years. Predictors of robust outcomes were identified using multivariable regression analysis with conditional inference tree for continuous variables. Results. We included 157 ASD patients in this analysis. At 1 year postoperatively, 62 patients (39.5%) met the BCO definition for ODI and 33 (21.0%) met the BCO for SRS. At 3 years, 58 patients (36.9%) had BCO for ODI and 29 (18.5%) for SRS. Ninety-five patients (60.5%) were identified as having a favorable outcome at 1 year postoperatively. At 3 years, 85 patients (54.1%) had a favorable outcome. Seventy-eight patients (49.7%) met criteria for a durable surgical result. Multivariable adjusted analysis identified the following independent predictors of surgical durability: surgical invasiveness >65, being fused to S1/pelvis, baseline to 6-week pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis difference >13.9°, and having a proportional Global Alignment and Proportion score at 6 weeks. Conclusions. Nearly 50% of the ASD cohort demonstrated good surgical durability, with favorable radiographic alignment and functional status maintained up to 3 years. Surgical durability was more likely in patients whose reconstruction was fused to the pelvis and addressed lumbopelvic mismatch with adequate surgical invasiveness to achieve full alignment correction.
KW - adult spinal deformity
KW - durability
KW - fusion
KW - kyphosis
KW - spine
KW - surgical outcomes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180270972&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004717
DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004717
M3 - Article
C2 - 37199423
AN - SCOPUS:85180270972
SN - 0362-2436
VL - 49
SP - 90
EP - 96
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
IS - 2
ER -