External validation of the DRAGON score in an elderly spanish population: Prediction of stroke prognosis after IV thrombolysis

Eva Giralt-Steinhauer, Ana Rodríguez-Campello, Elisa Cuadrado-Godia, Ángel Ois, Jordi Jiménez-Conde, Carolina Soriano-Tárraga, Jaume Roquer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


Background: Intravenous (i.v.) thrombolysis within 4.5 h of symptom onset has proven efficacy in acute ischemic stroke treatment, although half of all outcomes are unfavorable. The recently published DRAGON score aims to predict the 3-month outcome in stroke patients who have received i.v. alteplase. The purpose of this study was an external validation of the results of the DRAGON score in a Spanish cohort. Methods: Patients with acute stroke treated with alteplase were prospectively registered in our BasicMar database. We collected demographic characteristics, vascular risk factors, the time from stroke onset to treatment, baseline serum glucose levels and stroke severity for this population. We then reviewed hyperdense cerebral artery signs and signs of early infarct on the admission CT scan. We calculated the DRAGON score and used the developers' 3-month prognosis categories: good [modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 0-2], poor (mRS 3-6) and miserable (mRS 5-6) outcome. Discrimination was tested using the area under the receiver operator curve (AUC-ROC). Calibration was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results: Our final cohort of 297 patients was older (median age 74 years, IQR 65-80) and had more risk factors and severe strokes [median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) points 13, IQR 7-19] than the original study population. Poor prognosis was observed in 143 (48.1%) patients. Higher DRAGON scores were associated with a higher risk of poor prognosis. None of our treated stroke patients with a DRAGON score ≥8 at admission experienced a favorable outcome after 3 months. All DRAGON variables were significantly associated with a worse outcome in the multivariate analysis except for onset-to-treatment time (p = 0.334). Discrimination to predict poor prognosis was very good (AUC-ROC 0.84) and the score had good Hosmer-Lemeshow calibration (p = 0.84). Conclusions: The DRAGON score is easy to perform and offers a rapid, reliable prediction of poor prognosis in acute-stroke patients treated with alteplase. This study replicates the original results in a different population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-114
Number of pages5
JournalCerebrovascular Diseases
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2013


  • DRAGON score
  • Intravenous thrombolysis
  • Stroke prognosis


Dive into the research topics of 'External validation of the DRAGON score in an elderly spanish population: Prediction of stroke prognosis after IV thrombolysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this