TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the neurocircuitry underpinning predictability of threat in soldiers with PTSD compared to deployment exposed controls
AU - Dretsch, Michael N.
AU - Wood, Kimberly H.
AU - Daniel, Thomas A.
AU - Katz, Jeffrey S.
AU - Deshpande, Gopikrishna
AU - Goodman, Adam M.
AU - Wheelock, Muriah D.
AU - Wood, Kayli B.
AU - Denney, Thomas S.
AU - Traynham, Stephanie
AU - Knight, David C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was funded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC), Military Operational Medicine Research Program, and was supported in part by an appointment to the Internship/Research Participation Program for the USAMRMC, administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the USAMRMC. We would like to thank the staff and leadership at the USAARL and Auburn University for their support that made this study possible. Dr. Dretsch was the principle investigator (PI) of the study who secured funding, developed the protocol, analyzed the psychological health data, and was the primary author of the manuscript. Dr. Wood and Dr. Knight contributed to the study’s development and provided oversight to the analysis of MRI and SCR data. Ms. Wheelock and Dr. Wood were involved with analyzing the MRI and SCR data. Dr. Daniel, Dr. Jeff Katz, Dr. Goodman, and Dr. Deshpande collected data and assisted with analysis of MRI data. Dr. Denney was the site PI who provided oversight to data collection. Dr. Traynham assisted with recruitment and enrollment of participants.
Funding Information:
This project was funded by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC), Military Operational Medicine Research Program, and was supported in part by an appointment to the Internship/Research Participation Program for the USAMRMC, administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the USAMRMC. We would like to thank the staff and leadership at the USAARL and Auburn University for their support that made this study possible. Dr. Dretsch was the principle investigator (PI) of the study who secured funding, developed the protocol, analyzed the psychological health data, and was the primary author of the manuscript. Dr. Wood and Dr. Knight contributed to the study ᤀs development and provided oversight to the analysis of MRI and SCR data. Ms. Wheelock and Dr. Wood were involved with analyzing the MRI and SCR data. Dr. Daniel, Dr. Jeff Katz, Dr. Goodman, and Dr. Deshpande collected data and assisted with analysis of MRI data. Dr. Denney was the site PI who provided oversight to data collection. Dr. Traynham assisted with recruitment and enrollment of participants.
Publisher Copyright:
© Dretsch et al.
PY - 2016/10/31
Y1 - 2016/10/31
N2 - Background: Prior work examining emotional dysregulation observed in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has primarily been limited to fearlearning processes specific to anticipation, habituation, and extinction of threat. In contrast, the response to threat itself has not been systematically evaluated. Objective: To explore potential disruption in fear conditioning neurocircuitry in service members with PTSD, specifically in response to predictable versus unpredictable threats. Method: In the current study, active-duty U.S. Army soldiers with (PTSD group; n = 38) and without PTSD (deployment-exposed controls; DEC; n = 40), participated in a fear-conditioning study in which threat predictability was manipulated by presenting an aversive unconditioned stimulus (UCS) that was either preceded by a conditioned stimulus (i.e., predictable) or UCS alone (i.e., unpredictable). Threat expectation, skin conductance response (SCR), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal to predictable and unpredictable threats (i.e., UCS) were assessed. Results: Both groups showed greater threat expectancy and diminished threat-elicited SCRs to predictable compared to unpredictable threat. Significant group differences were observed within the amygdala, hippocampus, insula, and superior and middle temporal gyri. Contrary to our predictions, the PTSD group showed a diminished threat-related response within each of these brain regions during predictable compared to unpredictable threat, whereas the DEC group showed increased activation. Conclusion: Although, the PTSD group showed greater threat-related diminution, hypersensitivity to unpredictable threat cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, pre-trauma, trait-like factors may have contributed to group differences in activation of the neurocircuitry underpinning fear conditioning.
AB - Background: Prior work examining emotional dysregulation observed in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has primarily been limited to fearlearning processes specific to anticipation, habituation, and extinction of threat. In contrast, the response to threat itself has not been systematically evaluated. Objective: To explore potential disruption in fear conditioning neurocircuitry in service members with PTSD, specifically in response to predictable versus unpredictable threats. Method: In the current study, active-duty U.S. Army soldiers with (PTSD group; n = 38) and without PTSD (deployment-exposed controls; DEC; n = 40), participated in a fear-conditioning study in which threat predictability was manipulated by presenting an aversive unconditioned stimulus (UCS) that was either preceded by a conditioned stimulus (i.e., predictable) or UCS alone (i.e., unpredictable). Threat expectation, skin conductance response (SCR), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal to predictable and unpredictable threats (i.e., UCS) were assessed. Results: Both groups showed greater threat expectancy and diminished threat-elicited SCRs to predictable compared to unpredictable threat. Significant group differences were observed within the amygdala, hippocampus, insula, and superior and middle temporal gyri. Contrary to our predictions, the PTSD group showed a diminished threat-related response within each of these brain regions during predictable compared to unpredictable threat, whereas the DEC group showed increased activation. Conclusion: Although, the PTSD group showed greater threat-related diminution, hypersensitivity to unpredictable threat cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, pre-trauma, trait-like factors may have contributed to group differences in activation of the neurocircuitry underpinning fear conditioning.
KW - Amygdala
KW - Fear-conditioning
KW - Hippocampus
KW - Insula
KW - Military
KW - Neuroimaging
KW - PTSD
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037155348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2174/1874440001610010111
DO - 10.2174/1874440001610010111
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85037155348
VL - 10
SP - 111
EP - 124
JO - Open Neuroimaging Journal
JF - Open Neuroimaging Journal
SN - 1874-4400
ER -