TY - JOUR
T1 - Explicit or hidden? Exploring how occupation is taught in occupational therapy curricula in the United States
AU - Krishnagiri, Sheama
AU - Hooper, Barb
AU - Price, Pollie
AU - Taff, Steven D.
AU - Bilics, Andrea
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Ruth Zemke for her thoughtful review of the manuscript and William Roberts from Colorado State University for his insights as a peer debriefer for data analysis. We also acknowledge the humor, intellect, and valuable insights of the late Maralynne Mitcham, who graced our team for too short a time. This study was supported by a collaborative initiative of the Society for the Study of Occupation: USA and the American Occupational Therapy Foundation. Findings have been presented in part at the 1st joint Congress of the Council of Occupational Therapists for European Countries and the European Network of Occupational Therapy in Higher Education in Galway, Ireland; the 2015 AOTA/OT Centralized Application Service Educational Summit, Denver, CO; the 2015 Annual American Occupational Therapy Conference and Expo, Nashville, TN; the 2014 Joint International Conference in Occupational Science, Minneapolis; and the 16th International Congress of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists, Yokohama, Japan.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE. Occupation is considered core and threshold knowledge for occupational therapy, yet how it is conveyed through education is not well understood. This study examined how the concept of occupation was taught in occupational therapy and occupational therapy assistant curricula in the United States. METHOD. Using a qualitative descriptive research design, in-depth interviews, video recordings, and artifacts of teaching occupation were collected from 25 programs, chosen using stratified random sampling. Interview data were analyzed using an inductive, constant comparative approach; video and artifact data were analyzed deductively using findings from the interviews. RESULTS. Instructional methods were innovative and ranged from didactic to experiential. The degree to which occupation was present in instruction ranged from explicit to implicit to absent. CONCLUSION. Although educators valued teaching occupation, the concept was still elusive in some instructional methods and materials. Occupation knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge may have influenced how explicitly occupation was taught.
AB - OBJECTIVE. Occupation is considered core and threshold knowledge for occupational therapy, yet how it is conveyed through education is not well understood. This study examined how the concept of occupation was taught in occupational therapy and occupational therapy assistant curricula in the United States. METHOD. Using a qualitative descriptive research design, in-depth interviews, video recordings, and artifacts of teaching occupation were collected from 25 programs, chosen using stratified random sampling. Interview data were analyzed using an inductive, constant comparative approach; video and artifact data were analyzed deductively using findings from the interviews. RESULTS. Instructional methods were innovative and ranged from didactic to experiential. The degree to which occupation was present in instruction ranged from explicit to implicit to absent. CONCLUSION. Although educators valued teaching occupation, the concept was still elusive in some instructional methods and materials. Occupation knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge may have influenced how explicitly occupation was taught.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013671652&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5014/ajot.2017.024174
DO - 10.5014/ajot.2017.024174
M3 - Article
C2 - 28218591
AN - SCOPUS:85013671652
SN - 0272-9490
VL - 71
JO - American Journal of Occupational Therapy
JF - American Journal of Occupational Therapy
IS - 2
M1 - 7102230020
ER -