TY - JOUR
T1 - Expert Recommendations for Neurodevelopmental Screening in Children with Craniosynostosis
T2 - A Consensus Report from the Craniosynostosis Research Neurodevelopmental Working Group (SynRG)
AU - Baraya, Naman
AU - Thibodaux, Lia
AU - Martin, Arianna
AU - Stone, Caitlin
AU - Strahle, Jennifer
AU - Patel, Kamlesh
AU - Chapman, Leah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, American Cleft Palate Craniofacial Association.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: This study aims to address the gap in standardized neurodevelopmental screening for children with craniosynostosis following surgical intervention. It proposes a structured timeline for assessments to identify developmental delays and cognitive deficits, facilitating early intervention and improved outcomes. Design: Two neurodevelopmental expert consensus meetings were held virtually with pediatric neuropsychologists and psychologists to review existing literature and identify screening tools, timelines, and implementation strategies. The proposed protocol was then presented to multidisciplinary members of the SynRG research group, including surgeons and craniofacial specialists, to refine recommendations. Setting: The protocol is intended for implementation in multidisciplinary craniosynostosis clinics at tertiary care institutions across the United States. Patients, Participants: The study involved pediatric neuropsychologists and psychologists with expertise in neurodevelopment, as well as neurosurgeons and craniofacial specialists of the SynRG research group. Interventions: The proposed screening schedule spans infancy through adolescence, incorporating tools such as the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, NIH Toolbox, and PROMIS measures. Screening intervals align with developmental milestones and academic transitions. Main Outcome Measures: The study focused on feasibility, clinical utility, and the ability of the proposal to detect developmental concerns among craniosynostosis patients early. Results: The panel recommended a screening protocol tailored to key developmental stages, integrating caregiver input and direct assessments. Feedback from the SynRG group supported the protocol's feasibility but highlighted barriers such as neuropsychologist availability and insurance challenges. Conclusions: The proposal offers a scalable protocol to neurodevelopmental screening in craniosynostosis care. Implementation in clinical practice could enhance early identification and intervention, improving long-term outcomes.
AB - Objective: This study aims to address the gap in standardized neurodevelopmental screening for children with craniosynostosis following surgical intervention. It proposes a structured timeline for assessments to identify developmental delays and cognitive deficits, facilitating early intervention and improved outcomes. Design: Two neurodevelopmental expert consensus meetings were held virtually with pediatric neuropsychologists and psychologists to review existing literature and identify screening tools, timelines, and implementation strategies. The proposed protocol was then presented to multidisciplinary members of the SynRG research group, including surgeons and craniofacial specialists, to refine recommendations. Setting: The protocol is intended for implementation in multidisciplinary craniosynostosis clinics at tertiary care institutions across the United States. Patients, Participants: The study involved pediatric neuropsychologists and psychologists with expertise in neurodevelopment, as well as neurosurgeons and craniofacial specialists of the SynRG research group. Interventions: The proposed screening schedule spans infancy through adolescence, incorporating tools such as the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, NIH Toolbox, and PROMIS measures. Screening intervals align with developmental milestones and academic transitions. Main Outcome Measures: The study focused on feasibility, clinical utility, and the ability of the proposal to detect developmental concerns among craniosynostosis patients early. Results: The panel recommended a screening protocol tailored to key developmental stages, integrating caregiver input and direct assessments. Feedback from the SynRG group supported the protocol's feasibility but highlighted barriers such as neuropsychologist availability and insurance challenges. Conclusions: The proposal offers a scalable protocol to neurodevelopmental screening in craniosynostosis care. Implementation in clinical practice could enhance early identification and intervention, improving long-term outcomes.
KW - ages and stages questionnaire
KW - clinical feasibility
KW - cognitive assessment
KW - craniosynostosis
KW - neurodevelopmental assessment
KW - NIH toolbox
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105005549586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/10556656251339879
DO - 10.1177/10556656251339879
M3 - Article
C2 - 40368325
AN - SCOPUS:105005549586
SN - 1055-6656
JO - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
JF - Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
M1 - 10556656251339879
ER -