TY - JOUR
T1 - Expanding the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Teleconference Experience
T2 - From Twinning to International Cases Discussions
AU - Al Badarin, Essra'
AU - Chamdine, Omar
AU - Elayadi, Moatasem
AU - Al-Battashi, Abeer
AU - Al Nuaimi, Mohammed
AU - Alshamsi, Eman Taryam
AU - Hessissen, Laila
AU - Al-Tarrah, Hiba
AU - Maher, Eslam
AU - Farah, Roula
AU - Maaz, Ata
AU - Said, Waleed
AU - Hazaimeh, Ruba
AU - Khader, Maher
AU - Salami, Khadra
AU - Hawkins, Cynthia
AU - Abdelbaki, Mohamed S.
AU - Bartels, Ute
AU - Tabori, Uri
AU - Bouffet, Eric
AU - Amayiri, Nisreen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - PURPOSEVideo teleconferencing in neuro-oncology is feasible and sustainable. The well-established, 20-year long monthly teleconference between King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Jordan, and SickKids, Canada, is an example. Since 2018, several regional centers joined these meetings to discuss their patients' management plans. We aim to evaluate this experience.METHODSWe reviewed the minutes of 56 meetings (2018-2023). Preconference local treatment plans were compared with postconference recommendations. We documented the implementation of recommendations and the impact perceived by the treating oncologists.RESULTSTwo hundred fifty-one patients were discussed: 137 from Jordan and 114 from eight other countries. Four of the 14 participating oncologists had formal pediatric neuro-oncology training. Of the 227 patients (90%), where the local multidisciplinary team had suggested a preconference plan, the teleconference recommendations concurred with the proposed plan in 50% of cases, agreed on it and proposed an alternative option in 18%, and disagreed in 32%. The difference in recommendations mostly affected the proposed treatment modality. In 64% of discordant plans and 50% of alternative plans, the treating team applied the recommendations. The main challenges in applying the recommendations were attributed to patient-related factors (51%), local team consensus on a different plan (26%), or logistic difficulties (23%). The high patient load, longer involvement in teleconferencing, formal neuro-oncology training, and well-established multidisciplinary team helped the KHCC team formulate more concordant plans.CONCLUSIONThis experience illustrates the potential benefit for physicians to get an expert opinion on challenging cases. The participating oncologists valued the shared educational experience, especially those related to molecular testing and treatment implications. Joining such regional teleconferences is of particular importance to centers with small patient volume or those lacking a pediatric neuro-oncologist.
AB - PURPOSEVideo teleconferencing in neuro-oncology is feasible and sustainable. The well-established, 20-year long monthly teleconference between King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Jordan, and SickKids, Canada, is an example. Since 2018, several regional centers joined these meetings to discuss their patients' management plans. We aim to evaluate this experience.METHODSWe reviewed the minutes of 56 meetings (2018-2023). Preconference local treatment plans were compared with postconference recommendations. We documented the implementation of recommendations and the impact perceived by the treating oncologists.RESULTSTwo hundred fifty-one patients were discussed: 137 from Jordan and 114 from eight other countries. Four of the 14 participating oncologists had formal pediatric neuro-oncology training. Of the 227 patients (90%), where the local multidisciplinary team had suggested a preconference plan, the teleconference recommendations concurred with the proposed plan in 50% of cases, agreed on it and proposed an alternative option in 18%, and disagreed in 32%. The difference in recommendations mostly affected the proposed treatment modality. In 64% of discordant plans and 50% of alternative plans, the treating team applied the recommendations. The main challenges in applying the recommendations were attributed to patient-related factors (51%), local team consensus on a different plan (26%), or logistic difficulties (23%). The high patient load, longer involvement in teleconferencing, formal neuro-oncology training, and well-established multidisciplinary team helped the KHCC team formulate more concordant plans.CONCLUSIONThis experience illustrates the potential benefit for physicians to get an expert opinion on challenging cases. The participating oncologists valued the shared educational experience, especially those related to molecular testing and treatment implications. Joining such regional teleconferences is of particular importance to centers with small patient volume or those lacking a pediatric neuro-oncologist.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010696647
U2 - 10.1200/GO-25-00023
DO - 10.1200/GO-25-00023
M3 - Article
C2 - 40644645
AN - SCOPUS:105010696647
SN - 2687-8941
VL - 11
JO - JCO Global Oncology
JF - JCO Global Oncology
M1 - e2500023
ER -