TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining Gender Disparity in Academic Abdominal Radiology in North America
AU - Zulfiqar, Maria
AU - Khurshid, Kiran
AU - Moreno, Courtney C.
AU - Jalal, Sabeena
AU - Nayab, Asra
AU - Chang, Silvia D.
AU - Khara, Sayani Sejal
AU - Khosa, Faisal
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Khosa is the recipient of the Canadian Association of Radiologists – Young Investigator Award (2019); Rising Star Exchange Scholarship Program of French Society of Radiology (2019) and Humanitarian Award of Association of Physicians of Pakistani Descent of North America (2019).
Funding Information:
Studies have pointed out that lack of female mentors and colleagues leads to decreased research productivity from female physicians and hence the difficulty in obtaining research grants. 28 This invariably affects academic advancement as a promotion at an academic institution is merited based on scholarly activity, teaching ability, and clinical excellence with national and international recognition as an expert in one's field. Correspondingly, in our study, the gender gap widens with a higher leadership role as evidenced by the lowest percentage of females at the professor level in abdominal radiology (30.5%) where female professors are 3 times lower in number compared to male professors. An HI of 10 has been suggested as a reliable metric to predict the likelihood of receiving funding from the National Institute of Health (NIH). 29 In our study, the mean HI for females, although slightly better at the associate professor level, was consistently lower than males at all ranks and total citations by female abdominal faculty were also lower than their male counterparts.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - Background: Gender disparity exists in nearly every medical specialty, particularly in leadership roles and academia. Radiology is not exempt from this phenomenon, with women making up less than a third of radiology residents in the United States (US). This can have long-lasting effects on the career progression of female radiologists. Our search did not reveal any study on gender composition in academic abdominal radiology. Purpose: To evaluate the academic productivity and career advancement of female academic abdominal radiology faculty in the United States and Canada. Materials and methods: Parameters of academic achievement were measured, including the number of citations and publications, years of research, as well as H-index. Information regarding academic and leadership ranking among academic abdominal radiologists in the United States and Canada was also analyzed. Results: In academic abdominal radiology, there were fewer females than males (34.9% vs 65.1%; p-value 0.256). Among the female radiologists, the greatest proportion held the rank of assistant professor (40%). Female representation decreased with increasing rank. Females had a lower H-index than males (P-value = 0.0066) and significantly fewer years of research than males (P-value = 0.0243). Conclusion: Male predominance in academic abdominal radiology is similar to many other medical specialties, and encompasses senior faculty rank, leadership roles and research productivity.
AB - Background: Gender disparity exists in nearly every medical specialty, particularly in leadership roles and academia. Radiology is not exempt from this phenomenon, with women making up less than a third of radiology residents in the United States (US). This can have long-lasting effects on the career progression of female radiologists. Our search did not reveal any study on gender composition in academic abdominal radiology. Purpose: To evaluate the academic productivity and career advancement of female academic abdominal radiology faculty in the United States and Canada. Materials and methods: Parameters of academic achievement were measured, including the number of citations and publications, years of research, as well as H-index. Information regarding academic and leadership ranking among academic abdominal radiologists in the United States and Canada was also analyzed. Results: In academic abdominal radiology, there were fewer females than males (34.9% vs 65.1%; p-value 0.256). Among the female radiologists, the greatest proportion held the rank of assistant professor (40%). Female representation decreased with increasing rank. Females had a lower H-index than males (P-value = 0.0066) and significantly fewer years of research than males (P-value = 0.0243). Conclusion: Male predominance in academic abdominal radiology is similar to many other medical specialties, and encompasses senior faculty rank, leadership roles and research productivity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092623853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.09.001
DO - 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.09.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 33069519
AN - SCOPUS:85092623853
SN - 0363-0188
VL - 50
SP - 669
EP - 674
JO - Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
JF - Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
IS - 5
ER -