Examining commonsense epidemiology: The case of asthma

Gabrielle Pogge, Erika A. Waters, Gregory D. Webster, David Fedele, Sreekala Prabhakaran, James A. Shepperd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Commonsense epidemiology—how lay people think about diseases and their causes and consequences—can influence how people respond. We examined three lay epidemiological beliefs about 20 triggers and 19 symptoms among 349 caregivers of children with asthma. Our findings contradicted the prevalence-seriousness hypothesis (perceived prevalence and seriousness correlate negatively). The data partially supported the prevalence-control hypothesis (perceived prevalence and asthma control correlate negatively). We found weak support for the seriousness-control hypothesis (perceived seriousness and asthma control correlate negatively). These findings suggest boundary conditions on the application of commonsense epidemiological beliefs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2763-2769
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Health Psychology
Volume27
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • asthma caregivers
  • asthma control
  • asthma triggers and symptoms
  • childhood asthma
  • commonsense epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examining commonsense epidemiology: The case of asthma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this