Exact confidence interval estimation for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups

Lili Tian, Chengjie Xiong, Chin Ying Lai, Albert Vexler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the cases with three ordinal diagnostic groups, the important measures of diagnostic accuracy are the volume under surface (VUS) and the partial volume under surface (PVUS) which are the extended forms of the area under curve (AUC) and the partial area under curve (PAUC). This article addresses confidence interval estimation of the difference in paired VUS s and the difference in paired PVUS s. To focus especially on studies with small to moderate sample sizes, we propose an approach based on the concepts of generalized inference. A Monte Carlo study demonstrates that the proposed approach generally can provide confidence intervals with reasonable coverage probabilities even at small sample sizes. The proposed approach is compared to a parametric bootstrap approach and a large sample approach through simulation. Finally, the proposed approach is illustrated via an application to a data set of blood test results of anemia patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)549-558
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference
Volume141
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Keywords

  • Diagnostic accuracy
  • Generalized pivot
  • Generalized test variable
  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exact confidence interval estimation for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this