Evidence-Based Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery

Kevin Koo, Jared S. Winoker, Hiten D. Patel, Farzana Faisal, Natasha Gupta, Meredith R. Metcalf, Lynda Z. Mettee, Alexa R. Meyer, Christian P. Pavlovich, Phillip M. Pierorazio, Brian R. Matlaga

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Procedure-specific guidelines for postsurgical opioid use can decrease overprescribing and facilitate opioid stewardship. Initial recommendations were based on feasibility data from limited pilot studies. This study aims to refine opioid prescribing recommendations for endourological and minimally invasive urological procedures by integrating emerging clinical evidence with a panel consensus. Materials and Methods: A multistakeholder panel was convened with broad subspecialty expertise. Primary literature on opioid prescribing after 16 urological procedures was systematically assessed. Using a modified Delphi technique, the panel reviewed and revised procedure-specific recommendations and opioid stewardship strategies based on additional evidence. All recommendations were developed for opioid-naive adult patients after uncomplicated procedures. Results: Seven relevant studies on postsurgical opioid prescribing were identified: four studies on ureteroscopy, two studies on robotic prostatectomy including a combined study on robotic nephrectomy, and one study on transurethral prostate surgery. The panel affirmed prescribing ranges to allow tailoring quantities to anticipated need. The panel noted that zero opioid tablets would be potentially appropriate for all procedures. Following evidence review, the panel reduced the maximum recommended quantities for 11 of the 16 procedures; the other 5 procedures were unchanged. Opioids were no longer recommended following diagnostic endoscopy and transurethral resection procedures. Finally, data on prescribing decisions supported expanded stewardship strategies for first-time prescribing and ongoing quality improvement. Conclusion: Reductions in initial opioid prescribing recommendations are supported by evidence for most endourological and minimally invasive urological procedures. Shared decision-making before prescribing and periodic reevaluation of individual prescribing patterns are strongly recommended to strengthen opioid stewardship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1838-1843
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume35
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2021

Keywords

  • endourology
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • opioid-related disorders
  • opioids
  • prescription

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence-Based Recommendations for Opioid Prescribing after Endourological and Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this