Background: Cefiderocol is a new antibiotic used to treat infections with antibiotic resistant Gram-negative bacilli. The impact of differences between Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) brands on susceptibility testing is underexplored. Compounding the implementation of cefiderocol susceptibility testing is a lack of harmonization between different regulatory body breakpoint criteria. Methods: We performed Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion using BD, Hardy, and Remel MHA, in addition to broth microdilution for Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 25), Enterobacterales (n = 25), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 24), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 23). We analyzed disk diffusion diameters and minimum inhibitory concentrations using interpretive criteria from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Results: Breakpoint criteria impacted interpretation of susceptibly testing results, for example with the broth microdilution we found 8% (2/25) of A. baumannii isolates change interpretation between CLSI and EUCAST and 32% (8/25) change between CLSI and FDA, 12% (3/25) of Enterobacterales change between CLSI and EUCAST, 13% (3/23) of P. aeruginosa interpretations change between CLSI and FDA, and 4% (1/25) S. maltophilia change between CLSI and FDA. There was a significant difference between the zone disk diffusion diameters for P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia between Hardy and BD; which changed interpretation (using CLSI criteria) for 8.7% (2/23) for P. aeruginosa but 0% (0/24) for S. maltophilia. Conclusions: Breakpoint criteria impact cefiderocol susceptibility testing interpretation for broth microdilution and disk diffusion. Choice of MHA brand can also affect result interpretation.