Evaluation of patients labeled with a penicillin allergy to promote antimicrobial stewardship in dental practice

Peter B. Lockhart, Michael J. Durkin, Kimberly G. Blumenthal, Thomas M. Paumier, Larry M. Baddour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Approximately 10% of the US population self-reports a penicillin allergy history or are labeled as penicillin allergic. However, from 90% through 99% of these patients are not allergic on formal evaluation. Case Description: Patients labeled as penicillin allergic receive broader-spectrum and sometimes less-effective antibiotics, thereby contributing to increased treatment failures, antibiotic resistance, and adverse drug reactions. Self-reported penicillin allergy can be eliminated or classified as low-, medium-, or high-risk after a careful review of patient history. This allows these patients to be delabeled; that is, having any reference to their penicillin allergy history or of having an allergy to penicillin eliminated from their health records. Practical Implications: Oral health care professionals are ideally placed to partner in both antibiotic stewardship interventions by means of recognizing pervasive mislabeling and aiding in the process of delabeling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)565-573.e1
JournalJournal of the American Dental Association
Volume155
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Prophylaxis
  • allergy
  • antibiotic
  • cephalosporin
  • delabeling
  • drug challenge
  • guideline
  • infection
  • penicillin
  • β-lactam

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of patients labeled with a penicillin allergy to promote antimicrobial stewardship in dental practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this