Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

Jeffrey S. Barkun; Jeffrey K. Aronson; Liane S. Feldman; Guy J. Maddern; Steven M. Strasberg

doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

Jeffrey S. Barkun, Jeffrey K. Aronson, Liane S. Feldman, Guy J. Maddern, Steven M. Strasberg

Department of Surgery

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

460 Scopus citations

Abstract

Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1089-1096
Number of pages	8
Journal	The Lancet
Volume	374
Issue number	9695
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7
State	Published - Oct 2 2009

Access to Document

10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

Cite this

@article{5a749245c3e44d90b24b9e16d7e1a803,

title = "Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations",

abstract = "Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.",

author = "Barkun, {Jeffrey S.} and Aronson, {Jeffrey K.} and Feldman, {Liane S.} and Maddern, {Guy J.} and Strasberg, {Steven M.}",

note = "Funding Information: The Balliol Colloquium has been supported by Ethicon UK with unrestricted educational grants and by the National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme. The Balliol Colloquium was administratively and financially supported by the Nuffield Department of Surgery at the University of Oxford and the Department of Surgery at McGill University.",

year = "2009",

month = oct,

day = "2",

doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7",

language = "English",

volume = "374",

pages = "1089--1096",

journal = "The Lancet",

issn = "0140-6736",

number = "9695",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

AU - Barkun, Jeffrey S.

AU - Aronson, Jeffrey K.

AU - Feldman, Liane S.

AU - Maddern, Guy J.

AU - Strasberg, Steven M.

N1 - Funding Information: The Balliol Colloquium has been supported by Ethicon UK with unrestricted educational grants and by the National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme. The Balliol Colloquium was administratively and financially supported by the Nuffield Department of Surgery at the University of Oxford and the Department of Surgery at McGill University.

PY - 2009/10/2

Y1 - 2009/10/2

N2 - Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.

AB - Surgical innovation is an important part of surgical practice. Its assessment is complex because of idiosyncrasies related to surgical practice, but necessary so that introduction and adoption of surgical innovations can derive from evidence-based principles rather than trial and error. A regulatory framework is also desirable to protect patients against the potential harms of any novel procedure. In this first of three Series papers on surgical innovation and evaluation, we propose a five-stage paradigm to describe the development of innovative surgical procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349288302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61083-7

M3 - Review article

C2 - 19782874

AN - SCOPUS:70349288302

SN - 0140-6736

VL - 374

SP - 1089

EP - 1096

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

IS - 9695

ER -

Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this