Evaluating the role for regional analgesia in children with spina bifida: a retrospective observational study comparing the efficacy of regional versus systemic analgesia protocols following major urological surgery

Robert P. Moore, Nicholas E. Burjek, Megan A. Brockel, Andrew C. Strine, Austin Acks, Peter J. Boxley, Vidya Chidambaran, Gino J. Vricella, David I. Chu, Marie Sankaran-Raval, Rebecca S. Zee, Franklyn P. Cladis, Rajeev Chaudhry, Vikas N. O'Reilly-Shah, Jennifer J. Ahn, Kyle O. Rove

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction Regional techniques are a key component of multimodal analgesia and help decrease opioid use perioperatively, but some techniques may not be suitable for all patients, such as those with spina bifida. We hypothesized peripheral regional catheters would reduce postoperative opioid use compared with no regional analgesia without increasing pain scores in pediatric patients with spina bifida undergoing major urological surgery. Methods A retrospective review of a multicenter database established for the study of enhanced recovery after surgery was performed of patients from 2009 to 2021 who underwent bladder augmentation or creation of catheterizable channels. Patients without spina bifida and those receiving epidural analgesia were excluded. Opioids were converted into morphine equivalents and normalized to patient weight. Results 158 patients with pediatric spina bifida from 7 centers were included, including 87 with and 71 without regional catheters. There were no differences in baseline patient factors. Anesthesia setup increased from median 40 min (IQR 34-51) for no regional to 64 min (IQR 40-97) for regional catheters (p<0.01). The regional catheter group had lower median intraoperative opioid usage (0.24 vs 0.80 mg/kg morphine equivalents, p<0.01) as well as lower in-hospital postoperative opioid usage (0.05 vs 0.23 mg/kg/day morphine equivalents, p<0.01). Pain scores were not higher in the regional catheters group. Discussion Continuous regional analgesia following major urological surgery in children with spina bifida was associated with a 70% intraoperative and 78% postoperative reduction in opioids without higher pain scores. This approach should be considered for similar surgical interventions in this population. Trial registration number NCT03245242.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-36
Number of pages8
JournalRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 27 2022

Keywords

  • nerve block
  • pain management
  • pain, postoperative
  • pediatrics
  • regional anesthesia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the role for regional analgesia in children with spina bifida: a retrospective observational study comparing the efficacy of regional versus systemic analgesia protocols following major urological surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this