TY - JOUR
T1 - European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (endorsed by European society of intensive care medicine)
AU - Paul, Mical
AU - Carrara, Elena
AU - Retamar, Pilar
AU - Tängdén, Thomas
AU - Bitterman, Roni
AU - Bonomo, Robert A.
AU - de Waele, Jan
AU - Daikos, George L.
AU - Akova, Murat
AU - Harbarth, Stephan
AU - Pulcini, Celine
AU - Garnacho-Montero, José
AU - Seme, Katja
AU - Tumbarello, Mario
AU - Lindemann, Paul Christoffer
AU - Gandra, Sumanth
AU - Yu, Yunsong
AU - Bassetti, Matteo
AU - Mouton, Johan W.
AU - Tacconelli, Evelina
AU - Rodríguez-Baño, Jesús
N1 - Funding Information:
These guidelines were supported in part by ESCMID .
Funding Information:
MP has received research grants from Pfizer. PR has sat on the advisory board of Shionogi. RAB has received research grants from Merck, Wockhardt, Entasis and Shionogi. Jan de Waele has received honoraria for educational activities from MSD and Pfizer. GLD has received honoraria for educational activities from, consulted for and sat on the advisory board of Pfizer, MSD and Shionogi. MA has received honoraria for educational activities from Pfizer, MSD, Gilead and Genentech, and received research support from Pfizer and Gilead. SH has sat on advisory boards for Sandoz and Bode. JG-M has received honoraria for educational activities from Shionogi and Pfizer. MT has sat on advisory boards for Menarini, MSD and Shionogi, and received honoraria from Pfizer. MB has received honoraria and sat on advisory boards for Angelini, Astellas, Bayer, Biom?rieux, Cidara, Gilead, Menarini, MSD, Nabriva, Pfizer and Shionogi. EC, TT, RB, CP, BB, KS, PCL, SG, YY, JWM, ET and JRB have no conflicts of interest to declare.These guidelines were supported in part by ESCMID.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Scope: These ESCMID guidelines address the targeted antibiotic treatment of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE) and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the effectiveness of individual antibiotics and on combination versus monotherapy. Methods: An expert panel was convened by ESCMID. A systematic review was performed including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, examining different antibiotic treatment regimens for the targeted treatment of infections caused by the 3GCephRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Treatments were classified as head-to-head comparisons between individual antibiotics and between monotherapy and combination therapy regimens, including defined monotherapy and combination regimens only. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, preferably at 30 days and secondary outcomes included clinical failure, microbiological failure, development of resistance, relapse/recurrence, adverse events and length of hospital stay. The last search of all databases was conducted in December 2019, followed by a focused search for relevant studies up until ECCMID 2021. Data were summarized narratively. The certainty of the evidence for each comparison between antibiotics and between monotherapy and combination therapy regimens was classified by the GRADE recommendations. The strength of the recommendations for or against treatments was classified as strong or conditional (weak). Recommendations: The guideline panel reviewed the evidence per pathogen, preferably per site of infection, critically appraising the existing studies. Many of the comparisons were addressed in small observational studies at high risk of bias only. Notably, there was very little evidence on the effects of the new, recently approved, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors on infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Most recommendations are based on very-low- and low-certainty evidence. A high value was placed on antibiotic stewardship considerations in all recommendations, searching for carbapenem-sparing options for 3GCephRE and limiting the recommendations of the new antibiotics for severe infections, as defined by the sepsis-3 criteria. Research needs are addressed.
AB - Scope: These ESCMID guidelines address the targeted antibiotic treatment of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE) and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the effectiveness of individual antibiotics and on combination versus monotherapy. Methods: An expert panel was convened by ESCMID. A systematic review was performed including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, examining different antibiotic treatment regimens for the targeted treatment of infections caused by the 3GCephRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Treatments were classified as head-to-head comparisons between individual antibiotics and between monotherapy and combination therapy regimens, including defined monotherapy and combination regimens only. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, preferably at 30 days and secondary outcomes included clinical failure, microbiological failure, development of resistance, relapse/recurrence, adverse events and length of hospital stay. The last search of all databases was conducted in December 2019, followed by a focused search for relevant studies up until ECCMID 2021. Data were summarized narratively. The certainty of the evidence for each comparison between antibiotics and between monotherapy and combination therapy regimens was classified by the GRADE recommendations. The strength of the recommendations for or against treatments was classified as strong or conditional (weak). Recommendations: The guideline panel reviewed the evidence per pathogen, preferably per site of infection, critically appraising the existing studies. Many of the comparisons were addressed in small observational studies at high risk of bias only. Notably, there was very little evidence on the effects of the new, recently approved, β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors on infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Most recommendations are based on very-low- and low-certainty evidence. A high value was placed on antibiotic stewardship considerations in all recommendations, searching for carbapenem-sparing options for 3GCephRE and limiting the recommendations of the new antibiotics for severe infections, as defined by the sepsis-3 criteria. Research needs are addressed.
KW - Acinetobacter baumannii
KW - Carbapenem-resistant bacteria
KW - ESCMID
KW - GRADE
KW - Multidrug resistant bacteria
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123898699&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.11.025
DO - 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.11.025
M3 - Short survey
C2 - 34923128
AN - SCOPUS:85123898699
SN - 1198-743X
VL - 28
SP - 521
EP - 547
JO - Clinical Microbiology and Infection
JF - Clinical Microbiology and Infection
IS - 4
ER -