TY - JOUR
T1 - Estrogen receptor (ER) expression on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell free DNA (cfDNA) mutational landscape in the PACE randomized phase II study
AU - Reduzzi, Carolina
AU - Serafini, Mara Serena
AU - Gerratana, Lorenzo
AU - Jeselsohn, Rinath
AU - Mahtani, Reshma L.
AU - Ma, Cynthia X.
AU - DeMichele, Angela
AU - Meisel, Jane Lowe
AU - Miller, Kathy
AU - Abdou, Yara
AU - Riley, Elizabeth Carloss
AU - Qamar, Rubina
AU - Sharma, Priyanka
AU - Reid, Sonya A.
AU - Liu, Yuan
AU - Ren, Yue
AU - Regan, Meredith M.
AU - Liu, Huiping
AU - Mayer, Erica L.
AU - Cristofanilli, Massimo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© (2025), (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins). All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: The PACE (NCT03147287) randomized phase II trial investigates CDK4/6 inhibition beyond progression in combination with endocrine treatment, with or without PD-L1 inhibition, in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (Mayer et al 2024). We previously reported that cfDNA alterations and CTC number correlated with survival and treatment response (Jeselsohn et al 2024; Gerratana et al ASCO 2023). Here we investigated ER expression on CTCs in relation to the cfDNA mutational landscape. Methods: Samples were collected at baseline. CTC enumeration and ER protein expression on CTCs (by immunofluorescence) was evaluated with the CellSearch and the ACCEPT software. Samples were classified as CTChigh or CTClow (cutoff $5 CTC/sample). CTChigh samples were defined ER+ if.15% CTCs/sample expressed ER to ensure good inter-group stratification. Concurrently, cfDNA was analyzed with the Guardant360 assay. Only pathogenic single nucleotide (snv) and copy number variations (cnv) with $3% prevalence were included and categorized into oncogenic pathways (Sanchez-Vega et al 2018). Differences in distribution across CTC groups were tested through Chi-squared and Fisher’s test. Results: From 220 enrolled patients, 167 were evaluable for ER on CTCs. Of these, 91 were CTClow, 30 were CTChigh/ER-, and 46 CTChigh/ER+. ESR1 mutations were more common in CTChigh/ER+ samples, while CTChigh/ER- samples had higher incidence of alterations in SMAD4, PIK3CA, BRAF and CDK4 compared to the other 2 groups (Table 1). CTChigh/ER- had also higher mutant allele frequency compared to CTChigh/ER+ and CTClow (MAF. 3% in 73% vs 54% and 31%, respectively, p, 0.001). CTClow samples had overall lower cfDNA alteration incidence. Similarly, alterations in the ER pathway were more frequent in samples with CTChigh/ER+, whereas alterations in PI3K, cell cycle and P53 pathways were more common in CTChigh/ER- samples. Alterations in the RTK/RAS/RAF pathway were more common in CTChigh samples (23% and 28% for ER- and ER+ vs 9.9% for CTClow, p = 0.017). Similar results were observed with a 10% threshold. Conclusions: Distinct cfDNA alterations were identified based on ER expression in CTCs in HR+/HER2- MBC. Integrating CTC enumeration and cfDNA profiling may help elucidate resistance mechanisms, identify actionable targets, and predict benefit from continued CDK4/6 inhibition beyond progression. Research Sponsor: Pfizer; Merck KGaA; CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945.
AB - Background: The PACE (NCT03147287) randomized phase II trial investigates CDK4/6 inhibition beyond progression in combination with endocrine treatment, with or without PD-L1 inhibition, in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (Mayer et al 2024). We previously reported that cfDNA alterations and CTC number correlated with survival and treatment response (Jeselsohn et al 2024; Gerratana et al ASCO 2023). Here we investigated ER expression on CTCs in relation to the cfDNA mutational landscape. Methods: Samples were collected at baseline. CTC enumeration and ER protein expression on CTCs (by immunofluorescence) was evaluated with the CellSearch and the ACCEPT software. Samples were classified as CTChigh or CTClow (cutoff $5 CTC/sample). CTChigh samples were defined ER+ if.15% CTCs/sample expressed ER to ensure good inter-group stratification. Concurrently, cfDNA was analyzed with the Guardant360 assay. Only pathogenic single nucleotide (snv) and copy number variations (cnv) with $3% prevalence were included and categorized into oncogenic pathways (Sanchez-Vega et al 2018). Differences in distribution across CTC groups were tested through Chi-squared and Fisher’s test. Results: From 220 enrolled patients, 167 were evaluable for ER on CTCs. Of these, 91 were CTClow, 30 were CTChigh/ER-, and 46 CTChigh/ER+. ESR1 mutations were more common in CTChigh/ER+ samples, while CTChigh/ER- samples had higher incidence of alterations in SMAD4, PIK3CA, BRAF and CDK4 compared to the other 2 groups (Table 1). CTChigh/ER- had also higher mutant allele frequency compared to CTChigh/ER+ and CTClow (MAF. 3% in 73% vs 54% and 31%, respectively, p, 0.001). CTClow samples had overall lower cfDNA alteration incidence. Similarly, alterations in the ER pathway were more frequent in samples with CTChigh/ER+, whereas alterations in PI3K, cell cycle and P53 pathways were more common in CTChigh/ER- samples. Alterations in the RTK/RAS/RAF pathway were more common in CTChigh samples (23% and 28% for ER- and ER+ vs 9.9% for CTClow, p = 0.017). Similar results were observed with a 10% threshold. Conclusions: Distinct cfDNA alterations were identified based on ER expression in CTCs in HR+/HER2- MBC. Integrating CTC enumeration and cfDNA profiling may help elucidate resistance mechanisms, identify actionable targets, and predict benefit from continued CDK4/6 inhibition beyond progression. Research Sponsor: Pfizer; Merck KGaA; CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011883204
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.1054
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2025.43.16_suppl.1054
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105011883204
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 43
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 16
M1 - 1054
ER -