TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating Uncertainty of Geographic Atrophy Segmentations with Bayesian Deep Learning
AU - Spaide, Theodore
AU - Rajesh, Anand E.
AU - Gim, Nayoon
AU - Blazes, Marian
AU - Lee, Cecilia S.
AU - Macivannan, Niranchana
AU - Lee, Gary
AU - Lewis, Warren
AU - Salehi, Ali
AU - de Sisternes, Luis
AU - Herrera, Gissel
AU - Shen, Mengxi
AU - Gregori, Giovanni
AU - Rosenfeld, Philip J.
AU - Pramil, Varsha
AU - Waheed, Nadia
AU - Wu, Yue
AU - Zhang, Qinqin
AU - Lee, Aaron Y.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Purpose: To apply methods for quantifying uncertainty of deep learning segmentation of geographic atrophy (GA). Design: Retrospective analysis of OCT images and model comparison. Participants: One hundred twenty-six eyes from 87 participants with GA in the SWAGGER cohort of the Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Imaged with Swept-Source OCT (SS-OCT) study. Methods: The manual segmentations of GA lesions were conducted on structural subretinal pigment epithelium en face images from the SS-OCT images. Models were developed for 2 approximate Bayesian deep learning techniques, Monte Carlo dropout and ensemble, to assess the uncertainty of GA semantic segmentation and compared to a traditional deep learning model. Main Outcome Measures: Model performance (Dice score) was compared. Uncertainty was calculated using the formula for Shannon Entropy. Results: The output of both Bayesian technique models showed a greater number of pixels with high entropy than the standard model. Dice scores for the Monte Carlo dropout method (0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.87–0.93) and the ensemble method (0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.85–0.91) were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than for the traditional model (0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.78–0.86). Conclusions: Quantifying the uncertainty in a prediction of GA may improve trustworthiness of the models and aid clinicians in decision-making. The Bayesian deep learning techniques generated pixel-wise estimates of model uncertainty for segmentation, while also improving model performance compared with traditionally trained deep learning models. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
AB - Purpose: To apply methods for quantifying uncertainty of deep learning segmentation of geographic atrophy (GA). Design: Retrospective analysis of OCT images and model comparison. Participants: One hundred twenty-six eyes from 87 participants with GA in the SWAGGER cohort of the Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Imaged with Swept-Source OCT (SS-OCT) study. Methods: The manual segmentations of GA lesions were conducted on structural subretinal pigment epithelium en face images from the SS-OCT images. Models were developed for 2 approximate Bayesian deep learning techniques, Monte Carlo dropout and ensemble, to assess the uncertainty of GA semantic segmentation and compared to a traditional deep learning model. Main Outcome Measures: Model performance (Dice score) was compared. Uncertainty was calculated using the formula for Shannon Entropy. Results: The output of both Bayesian technique models showed a greater number of pixels with high entropy than the standard model. Dice scores for the Monte Carlo dropout method (0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.87–0.93) and the ensemble method (0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.85–0.91) were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than for the traditional model (0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.78–0.86). Conclusions: Quantifying the uncertainty in a prediction of GA may improve trustworthiness of the models and aid clinicians in decision-making. The Bayesian deep learning techniques generated pixel-wise estimates of model uncertainty for segmentation, while also improving model performance compared with traditionally trained deep learning models. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
KW - Age-Related macular degeneration (AMD)
KW - Bayesian deep learning
KW - Geographic atrophy (GA)
KW - Model uncertainty
KW - OCT
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85204399186
U2 - 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100587
DO - 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100587
M3 - Article
C2 - 39380882
AN - SCOPUS:85204399186
SN - 2666-9145
VL - 5
JO - Ophthalmology Science
JF - Ophthalmology Science
IS - 1
M1 - 100587
ER -