Estimating Uncertainty of Geographic Atrophy Segmentations with Bayesian Deep Learning

  • Theodore Spaide
  • , Anand E. Rajesh
  • , Nayoon Gim
  • , Marian Blazes
  • , Cecilia S. Lee
  • , Niranchana Macivannan
  • , Gary Lee
  • , Warren Lewis
  • , Ali Salehi
  • , Luis de Sisternes
  • , Gissel Herrera
  • , Mengxi Shen
  • , Giovanni Gregori
  • , Philip J. Rosenfeld
  • , Varsha Pramil
  • , Nadia Waheed
  • , Yue Wu
  • , Qinqin Zhang
  • , Aaron Y. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To apply methods for quantifying uncertainty of deep learning segmentation of geographic atrophy (GA). Design: Retrospective analysis of OCT images and model comparison. Participants: One hundred twenty-six eyes from 87 participants with GA in the SWAGGER cohort of the Nonexudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration Imaged with Swept-Source OCT (SS-OCT) study. Methods: The manual segmentations of GA lesions were conducted on structural subretinal pigment epithelium en face images from the SS-OCT images. Models were developed for 2 approximate Bayesian deep learning techniques, Monte Carlo dropout and ensemble, to assess the uncertainty of GA semantic segmentation and compared to a traditional deep learning model. Main Outcome Measures: Model performance (Dice score) was compared. Uncertainty was calculated using the formula for Shannon Entropy. Results: The output of both Bayesian technique models showed a greater number of pixels with high entropy than the standard model. Dice scores for the Monte Carlo dropout method (0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.87–0.93) and the ensemble method (0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.85–0.91) were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than for the traditional model (0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.78–0.86). Conclusions: Quantifying the uncertainty in a prediction of GA may improve trustworthiness of the models and aid clinicians in decision-making. The Bayesian deep learning techniques generated pixel-wise estimates of model uncertainty for segmentation, while also improving model performance compared with traditionally trained deep learning models. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100587
JournalOphthalmology Science
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2025

Keywords

  • Age-Related macular degeneration (AMD)
  • Bayesian deep learning
  • Geographic atrophy (GA)
  • Model uncertainty
  • OCT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating Uncertainty of Geographic Atrophy Segmentations with Bayesian Deep Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this