TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishment and Characterization of Bacterial Infection of Breast Implants in a Murine Model
AU - Walker, Jennifer N.
AU - Poppler, Louis H.
AU - Pinkner, Chloe L.
AU - Hultgren, Scott J.
AU - Myckatyn, Terence M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Myckatyn receives investigator-initiated grant funding and consultant fees from RTI and investigator-initiated grant funding, consultant, and advisory board fees from Allergan. The other authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article.
Funding Information:
This study was supported by a grant from the Aesthetic Surgery Education Research Foundation (ASERF) grant awarded to Dr Myckatyn.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Aesthetic Society.
PY - 2020/4/14
Y1 - 2020/4/14
N2 - Background: Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the most common causes of Gram-positive and Gram-negative breast implant-associated infection. Little is known about how these bacteria infect breast implants as a function of implant surface characteristics and timing of infection. Objectives: The aim of this work was to establish a mouse model for studying the impact of various conditions on breast implant infection. Methods: Ninety-one mice were implanted with 273 breast implant shells and infected with S. epidermidis or P. aeruginosa. Smooth, microtextured, and macrotextured breast implant shells were implanted in each mouse. Bacterial inoculation occurred during implantation or 1 day later. Implants were retrieved 1 or 7 days later. Explanted breast implant shells were sonicated, cultured, and colony-forming units determined or analyzed with scanning electron microscopy. Results: P. aeruginosa could be detected on all device surfaces at 1- and 7- days post infection (dpi), when mice were implanted and infected concurrently or when they were infected 1- day after implantation. However, P. aeruginosa infection was more robust on implant shells retrieved at 7 dpi and particularly on the macrotextured devices that were infected 1 day post implantation. S. epidermidis was mostly cleared from implants when mice were infected and implanted concurrently. Other the other hand, S. epidermidis could be detected on all device surfaces at 1 dpi and 2 days post implantation. However, S. epidermdis infection was suppressed by 7 dpi and 8 days post implantation. Conclusions: S. epidermidis required higher inoculating doses to cause infection and was cleared within 7 days. P. aeruginosa infected at lower inoculating doses, with robust biofilms noted 7 days later.
AB - Background: Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the most common causes of Gram-positive and Gram-negative breast implant-associated infection. Little is known about how these bacteria infect breast implants as a function of implant surface characteristics and timing of infection. Objectives: The aim of this work was to establish a mouse model for studying the impact of various conditions on breast implant infection. Methods: Ninety-one mice were implanted with 273 breast implant shells and infected with S. epidermidis or P. aeruginosa. Smooth, microtextured, and macrotextured breast implant shells were implanted in each mouse. Bacterial inoculation occurred during implantation or 1 day later. Implants were retrieved 1 or 7 days later. Explanted breast implant shells were sonicated, cultured, and colony-forming units determined or analyzed with scanning electron microscopy. Results: P. aeruginosa could be detected on all device surfaces at 1- and 7- days post infection (dpi), when mice were implanted and infected concurrently or when they were infected 1- day after implantation. However, P. aeruginosa infection was more robust on implant shells retrieved at 7 dpi and particularly on the macrotextured devices that were infected 1 day post implantation. S. epidermidis was mostly cleared from implants when mice were infected and implanted concurrently. Other the other hand, S. epidermidis could be detected on all device surfaces at 1 dpi and 2 days post implantation. However, S. epidermdis infection was suppressed by 7 dpi and 8 days post implantation. Conclusions: S. epidermidis required higher inoculating doses to cause infection and was cleared within 7 days. P. aeruginosa infected at lower inoculating doses, with robust biofilms noted 7 days later.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083535419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/asj/sjz190
DO - 10.1093/asj/sjz190
M3 - Article
C2 - 31259380
AN - SCOPUS:85083535419
SN - 1090-820X
VL - 40
SP - 516
EP - 528
JO - Aesthetic surgery journal
JF - Aesthetic surgery journal
IS - 5
ER -