TY - JOUR
T1 - Esophagectomy for complex benign esophageal disease
AU - Waters, P. F.
AU - Pearson, F. G.
AU - Todd, T. R.
AU - Patterson, G. A.
AU - Goldberg, M.
AU - Ginsberg, R. J.
AU - Cooper, J. D.
AU - Ramirez, J.
AU - Miller, L.
PY - 1988
Y1 - 1988
N2 - We evaluated the use of total thoracic esophagectomy and replacement with stomach in a group of 21 patients between 1976 and 1986 who had undergone multiple unsuccessful esophageal operations. All patients had between one and four unsuccessful operations for benign esophageal disorders. Sixteen patients had primary motor disorders: achalasia in nine and esophageal spasm in seven. Of these patients, 11 also had recurrent gastroesophageal reflux and peptic esophagitis. Complicated reflux disease characterized by severe esophagitis, stricture, and impaired peristalsis without primary motor disorder occurred in five patients. In one patient a functionally impaired long-segment colon interposition was removed and replaced with stomach. Total thoracic esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastric reconstruction was done in all patients. The transhiatal approach was chosen for resection in 16 patients and thoracotomy was used in the other five. There was one perioperative death (5%), from massive aspiration 4 days after transhiatal esophagectomy. Other complications included transient anastomotic leak (three patients), tracheoesophageal fistula (one), recurrent nerve palsy (one), and transient hoarseness (two). Follow-up is complete between 1 and 10 years and reveals the following functional results: 12 patients good to excellent, seven fair, one poor. In this patient group in which multiple prior procedures have failed to improve severe incapacitating symptoms, we believe further attempts at hiatal reconstruction are unlikely to succeed. For this circumstance, we recommend total thoracic esophagectomy with the use of stomach as the replacement organ of choice.
AB - We evaluated the use of total thoracic esophagectomy and replacement with stomach in a group of 21 patients between 1976 and 1986 who had undergone multiple unsuccessful esophageal operations. All patients had between one and four unsuccessful operations for benign esophageal disorders. Sixteen patients had primary motor disorders: achalasia in nine and esophageal spasm in seven. Of these patients, 11 also had recurrent gastroesophageal reflux and peptic esophagitis. Complicated reflux disease characterized by severe esophagitis, stricture, and impaired peristalsis without primary motor disorder occurred in five patients. In one patient a functionally impaired long-segment colon interposition was removed and replaced with stomach. Total thoracic esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastric reconstruction was done in all patients. The transhiatal approach was chosen for resection in 16 patients and thoracotomy was used in the other five. There was one perioperative death (5%), from massive aspiration 4 days after transhiatal esophagectomy. Other complications included transient anastomotic leak (three patients), tracheoesophageal fistula (one), recurrent nerve palsy (one), and transient hoarseness (two). Follow-up is complete between 1 and 10 years and reveals the following functional results: 12 patients good to excellent, seven fair, one poor. In this patient group in which multiple prior procedures have failed to improve severe incapacitating symptoms, we believe further attempts at hiatal reconstruction are unlikely to succeed. For this circumstance, we recommend total thoracic esophagectomy with the use of stomach as the replacement organ of choice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023865452&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)35756-3
DO - 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)35756-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 3343848
AN - SCOPUS:0023865452
SN - 0022-5223
VL - 95
SP - 378
EP - 381
JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 3
ER -