TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - TREM2 Haplodeficiency in Mice and Humans Impairs the Microglia Barrier Function Leading to Decreased Amyloid Compaction and Severe Axonal Dystrophy (Neuron (****) ** (***–***)(10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.003)(S0896627316301635))
AU - Yuan, Peng
AU - Condello, Carlo
AU - Keene, C. Dirk
AU - Wang, Yaming
AU - Bird, Thomas D.
AU - Paul, Steven M.
AU - Luo, Wenjie
AU - Colonna, Marco
AU - Baddeley, David
AU - Grutzendler, Jaime
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/10/5
Y1 - 2016/10/5
N2 - (Neuron 90, 724–739; May 18, 2016) We thank one of the readers for bringing to light that in several figures of the original publication, we used statistical tests without multiple comparisons correction. We have now applied the more appropriate one- or two-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey tests or the Student's t test with Bonferroni multiple comparisons correction. The corrected analyses apply to the quantifications in Figures 1C, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2H, 3B, 3C, 3F, 3H, 4G, 4I, 4J, 5C, 5D, 6B, 6C, 7B, 7D, S2D, S3B, S3D, S4C, and S5C. All significance levels based on the new p values are reported in the corrected figures and the statistical tests used are reported in the corresponding figure legends and in the experimental procedures section online. Changes in the significance levels were made to Figures 2B, 2D, 2H, 3B, 3F, 4G, 4I, 4J, 5C, 5D, 6B, 7B, 7D, S2D, and S3B. All comparisons that were considered statistically significant remain significant at a p < 0.05 value, except for one case in Figure S2D. These modifications do not change any of the conclusions of our paper. The authors regret the error.
AB - (Neuron 90, 724–739; May 18, 2016) We thank one of the readers for bringing to light that in several figures of the original publication, we used statistical tests without multiple comparisons correction. We have now applied the more appropriate one- or two-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey tests or the Student's t test with Bonferroni multiple comparisons correction. The corrected analyses apply to the quantifications in Figures 1C, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2H, 3B, 3C, 3F, 3H, 4G, 4I, 4J, 5C, 5D, 6B, 6C, 7B, 7D, S2D, S3B, S3D, S4C, and S5C. All significance levels based on the new p values are reported in the corrected figures and the statistical tests used are reported in the corresponding figure legends and in the experimental procedures section online. Changes in the significance levels were made to Figures 2B, 2D, 2H, 3B, 3F, 4G, 4I, 4J, 5C, 5D, 6B, 7B, 7D, S2D, and S3B. All comparisons that were considered statistically significant remain significant at a p < 0.05 value, except for one case in Figure S2D. These modifications do not change any of the conclusions of our paper. The authors regret the error.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992750914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.016
DO - 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.016
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 27710785
AN - SCOPUS:84992750914
SN - 0896-6273
VL - 92
SP - 252
EP - 264
JO - Neuron
JF - Neuron
IS - 1
ER -