Abstract
Due to an error during production, Section 3.2 in the results section was inadvertently omitted in the published paper [1]. The corrected section is provided below: 3.2. Cancer and Employment Status Table 2 presents estimates from random slope logistic regression models for employment status. In all models, women were less likely to be employed overtime. Significant intra-individual differences in employment status changes were found, with some women experiencing an improvement in employment status and others a decline. Model 1 contains the estimates for the effect of cancer on the initial level and rate of change in employment status, after adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related factors. At baseline, there was no significant difference in employment status between cancer survivors and the comparison group. Over time, however, compared to women without cancer, cancer survivors had a 1.33 times greater likelihood of working (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.11–1.58).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 9117 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-3 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 24 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Dec 2 2020 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum: Long-term employment outcomes among female cancer survivors (Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2751)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver