Abstract
(Neuron 112, 384–403.e1–e8; February 7, 2024) Unfortunately, we inadvertently duplicated the graphs in Figures 8C and 8D in the original publication of our article. The wrong dataset was inserted in Prism while transferring data from Excel. The quantification of EC/PC volume with the correct values is now corrected online. The corrected graph in Figure 8D depicts an ∼32% reduction in EC/PC volume in TE4 vs. E4 (from the average of 5.767 mm3 in E4 to 3.945 mm3 in TE4) and an ∼17% reduction in TE4/Abca1 vs. E4 (from the average of 5.767 mm3 in E4 to 4.802 mm3 in TE4/Abca1). The revised graph does not affect the interpretation of these data in the body of the manuscript, as we previously stated that relative to E4 mice, the TE4/Abca1 mice were protected from EC/PC atrophy when compared to TE4 mice. We regret the error.[Formula
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2079 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Neuron |
Volume | 112 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs |
|
State | Published - Jun 19 2024 |