TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental Factors Contributing to Wrongdoing in Medicine
T2 - A Criterion-Based Review of Studies and Cases
AU - DuBois, James M.
AU - Anderson, Emily E.
AU - Carroll, Kelly
AU - Gibb, Tyler
AU - Kraus, Elena
AU - Rubbelke, Timothy
AU - Vasher, Meghan
N1 - Funding Information:
This article was supported by grants UL1RR024992 and 1R21RR026313 from the NIH-National Center for Research Resources and a seed grant from the BF Charitable Foundation. We thank Drs. Michael Mumford, Marvin Berkowitz, and John Chibnall for discussions that have led to the refinement of the psychological variables described in this article.
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - In this article we describe our approach to understanding wrongdoing in medical research and practice, which involves the statistical analysis of coded data from a large set of published cases. We focus on understanding the environmental factors that predict the kind and the severity of wrongdoing in medicine. Through review of empirical and theoretical literature, consultation with experts, the application of criminological theory, and ongoing analysis of our first 60 cases, we hypothesize that 10 contextual features of the medical environment (including financial rewards, oversight failures, and patients belonging to vulnerable groups) may contribute to professional wrongdoing. We define each variable, examine data supporting our hypothesis, and present a brief case synopsis from our study that illustrates the potential influence of the variable. Finally, we discuss limitations of the resulting framework and directions for future research.
AB - In this article we describe our approach to understanding wrongdoing in medical research and practice, which involves the statistical analysis of coded data from a large set of published cases. We focus on understanding the environmental factors that predict the kind and the severity of wrongdoing in medicine. Through review of empirical and theoretical literature, consultation with experts, the application of criminological theory, and ongoing analysis of our first 60 cases, we hypothesize that 10 contextual features of the medical environment (including financial rewards, oversight failures, and patients belonging to vulnerable groups) may contribute to professional wrongdoing. We define each variable, examine data supporting our hypothesis, and present a brief case synopsis from our study that illustrates the potential influence of the variable. Finally, we discuss limitations of the resulting framework and directions for future research.
KW - moral psychology
KW - professional ethics
KW - professional misconduct
KW - professional wrongdoing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861492480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10508422.2011.641832
DO - 10.1080/10508422.2011.641832
M3 - Review article
C2 - 23226933
AN - SCOPUS:84861492480
SN - 1050-8422
VL - 22
SP - 163
EP - 188
JO - Ethics and Behavior
JF - Ethics and Behavior
IS - 3
ER -