Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided Portosystemic Pressure Gradient Correlates With Clinical Parameters and Liver Histology

  • Jennifer M. Kolb
  • , Marc Monachese
  • , Raymond A. Rubin
  • , Thomas J. Wang
  • , Alyssa Choi
  • , Ahmad N. Bazarbashi
  • , Bhaumik Brahmbhatt
  • , Ali Zakaria
  • , Pedro Cortes
  • , Varun Kesar
  • , William F. Abel
  • , Wen Pin Chen
  • , Christine McLaren
  • , Amirali Tavangar
  • , Amit G. Singal
  • , Pushpak Taunk
  • , Michael B. Wallace
  • , Prashant Kedia
  • , David Lee
  • , Ali Abbas
  • Paul Yeaton, Natalie Cosgrove, Vivek Kesar, Kenneth J. Chang, Marvin Ryou, Jason Samarasena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound–guided portosystemic pressure gradient measurement (EUS-PPG) is a novel technique to evaluate for portal hypertension (PH), a diagnosis that can prognosticate and guide therapy for patients. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of EUS-PPG and correlation with clinical parameters and liver histology. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of patients undergoing EUS-PPG from January 2020 to December 2022 for suspected liver disease or PH. Linear regression was used to examine the relationship between EUS-PPG and clinical parameters of PH, and the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test described correlation with liver biopsy histology and noninvasive markers of fibrosis (Fibrosis-4, APRI [aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index]). Logistic regression was performed to identify the strongest predictor of histologic cirrhosis. Results: Across 8 centers, 385 patients were enrolled and 373 had successful EUS-PPG (technical success 97%). Higher median PPGs were observed in patients with than without esophageal varices (11.6 mm Hg vs 4.1 mm Hg), portal hypertensive gastropathy (10.5 mm Hg vs 3.3 mm Hg), and thrombocytopenia (7.6 mm Hg vs 4.4 mm Hg) (P < .001). Individuals with PH and clinically significant PH (PPG ≥10) were 6.7 and 3.8 times more likely to have cirrhosis on histology, respectively. EUS-PPG was the best overall predictor of biopsy-proven cirrhosis (area under the curve 0.84) compared with Fibrosis-4 (0.72), and APRI (0.54). There were 2 minor adverse events related to PPG (postprocedural pain). Conclusions: EUS-PPG measurement was technically feasible and safe and demonstrated a strong correlation with clinical parameters of PH and liver histology. The strongest predictor of cirrhosis was EUS-PPG >5 mm Hg, which outperformed noninvasive markers of fibrosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2167-2175.e4
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume23
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2025

Keywords

  • Cirrhosis
  • Endohepatology
  • Portal Hypertension
  • Portal Pressure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided Portosystemic Pressure Gradient Correlates With Clinical Parameters and Liver Histology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this