Endogenous Colonial Borders: Precolonial States and Geography in the Partition of Africa

Jack Paine, Xiaoyan Qiu, Joan Ricart-Huguet

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    We revise the conventional wisdom that Africa's international borders were drawn arbitrarily. Europeans knew very little about most of Africa in the mid-1880s, but their self-interested goals of amassing territory prompted intensive examination of on-the-ground conditions as they formed borders. Europeans negotiated with African rulers to secure treaties and to learn about historical state frontiers, which enabled Africans to influence the border-formation process. Major water bodies, which shaped precolonial civilizations and trade, also served as focal points. We find support for these new theoretical implications using two original datasets. Quantitatively, we analyze border-location correlates using grid cells and an original spatial dataset on precolonial states. Qualitatively, we compiled information from treaties and diplomatic histories to code causal process observations for every bilateral border. Historical political frontiers directly affected 62% of all bilateral borders. Water bodies, often major ones, comprised the primary border feature much more frequently than straight lines.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-20
    Number of pages20
    JournalAmerican Political Science Review
    Volume119
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 1 2025

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Endogenous Colonial Borders: Precolonial States and Geography in the Partition of Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this