TY - CHAP
T1 - Endocochlear Potential Measures, Local Drug Application, and Perilymph Sampling in the Mouse Inner Ear
AU - Ohlemiller, Kevin K.
AU - Hartsock, Jared J.
AU - Salt, Alec N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Functionally and anatomically, the laboratory mouse inner ear is comparable to other mammals, except that it is considerably smaller and operates over a higher acoustic frequency range. Other than miniaturization of methods that might be applied to the inner ears of guinea pigs, gerbils, or chinchillas, the major difference lies in fewer points of access, due both to small number of cochlear turns and reduced access to cochlear scalae in any single turn. These features do not particularly complicate auditory brainstem, compound action potential, or distortion product emission recording. Due to the close proximity to generators, these responses can be quite large in mice. Instead, they present challenges for endocochlear potential (EP) measurement and for manipulations and measurements of inner ear fluids. Without appropriate modifications, considerable technical challenges and potential pitfalls can render such measurements uninterpretable in mice. This chapter outlines experimental techniques for targeting inner ear fluid manipulations and fluid measures in mice. We specifically consider methods for EP measurement, perilymph sampling, and introduction of chemical agents into the middle or inner ear.
AB - Functionally and anatomically, the laboratory mouse inner ear is comparable to other mammals, except that it is considerably smaller and operates over a higher acoustic frequency range. Other than miniaturization of methods that might be applied to the inner ears of guinea pigs, gerbils, or chinchillas, the major difference lies in fewer points of access, due both to small number of cochlear turns and reduced access to cochlear scalae in any single turn. These features do not particularly complicate auditory brainstem, compound action potential, or distortion product emission recording. Due to the close proximity to generators, these responses can be quite large in mice. Instead, they present challenges for endocochlear potential (EP) measurement and for manipulations and measurements of inner ear fluids. Without appropriate modifications, considerable technical challenges and potential pitfalls can render such measurements uninterpretable in mice. This chapter outlines experimental techniques for targeting inner ear fluid manipulations and fluid measures in mice. We specifically consider methods for EP measurement, perilymph sampling, and introduction of chemical agents into the middle or inner ear.
KW - Auditory bulla
KW - Endocochlear potential
KW - Intralabyrinthine injection
KW - Intratympanic injection
KW - Posterior semicircular canal
KW - Round window membrane
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122434019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-1-0716-2022-9_12
DO - 10.1007/978-1-0716-2022-9_12
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85122434019
T3 - Neuromethods
SP - 275
EP - 301
BT - Neuromethods
PB - Humana Press Inc.
ER -