TY - JOUR
T1 - Empirical investigation of radiologists' priorities for PACS selection
T2 - An analytical hierarchy process approach
AU - Joshi, Vivek
AU - Lee, Kyootai
AU - Melson, David
AU - Narra, Vamsi R.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011/8
Y1 - 2011/8
N2 - Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are being widely adopted in radiology practice. The objective of this study was to find radiologists' perspective on the relative importance of the required features when selecting or developing a PACS. Important features for PACS were identified based on the literature and consultation/interviews with radiologists. These features were categorized and organized into a logical hierarchy consisting of the main dimensions and sub-dimensions. An online survey was conducted to obtain data from 58 radiologists about their relative preferences. Analytical hierarchy process methodology was used to determine the relative priority weights for different dimensions along with the consistency of responses. System continuity and functionality was found to be the most important dimension, followed by system performance and architecture, user interface for workflow management, user interface for image manipulation, and display quality. Among the sub-dimensions, the top two features were: security, backup, and downtime prevention; and voice recognition, transcription, and reporting. Structured reporting was also given very high priority. The results point to the dimensions that can be critical discriminators between different PACS and highlight the importance of faster integration of the emerging developments in radiology into PACS.
AB - Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are being widely adopted in radiology practice. The objective of this study was to find radiologists' perspective on the relative importance of the required features when selecting or developing a PACS. Important features for PACS were identified based on the literature and consultation/interviews with radiologists. These features were categorized and organized into a logical hierarchy consisting of the main dimensions and sub-dimensions. An online survey was conducted to obtain data from 58 radiologists about their relative preferences. Analytical hierarchy process methodology was used to determine the relative priority weights for different dimensions along with the consistency of responses. System continuity and functionality was found to be the most important dimension, followed by system performance and architecture, user interface for workflow management, user interface for image manipulation, and display quality. Among the sub-dimensions, the top two features were: security, backup, and downtime prevention; and voice recognition, transcription, and reporting. Structured reporting was also given very high priority. The results point to the dimensions that can be critical discriminators between different PACS and highlight the importance of faster integration of the emerging developments in radiology into PACS.
KW - Backup
KW - Display quality
KW - Downtime prevention
KW - Open systems proprietary systems
KW - PACS
KW - RIS
KW - Recovery
KW - Security
KW - Structured reporting
KW - System architecture and performance
KW - System continuity
KW - Transcription
KW - User interface for image manipulation
KW - User interface workflow management
KW - Voice recognition
KW - Worklist
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053901132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10278-010-9332-3
DO - 10.1007/s10278-010-9332-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 20824302
AN - SCOPUS:80053901132
SN - 0897-1889
VL - 24
SP - 700
EP - 708
JO - Journal of Digital Imaging
JF - Journal of Digital Imaging
IS - 4
ER -