TY - JOUR
T1 - Emotional contexts influence toddlers’ prosocial strategies
AU - Donohue, Meghan Rose
AU - Williamson, Rebecca A.
AU - Tully, Erin C.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The work of Dr. Donohue was supported by NIH Grant T32 MH100019 (PIs: Barch & Luby).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Prosocial behavior is a highly heterogeneous construct, and young children use distinct prosocial actions in response to differing emotional needs of another person. This study examined whether toddlers’ prosocial responses differed in response to two understudied emotional contexts—whether or not children caused a victim’s distress and the specific emotion expressed by the victim. Toddlers (N = 86; Mage = 35 months) and their parent participated in two separate mishap paradigms in which parents feigned pain and sadness, respectively. Half of the sample was led to believe they had transgressed to cause their parent’s distress, whereas the other half simply witnessed parent distress as bystanders. Results indicated that toddlers were overall equally prosocial when they were transgressors compared to when they were bystanders and significantly more prosocial in response to sadness than pain. Toddlers were significantly more likely to use affection as transgressors than bystanders, information seeking as bystanders than transgressors, and affection in response to pain than sadness. All children used greater helping in response to sadness than pain, and this was especially true when they were bystanders. Findings add to mounting evidence of the complexity of prosocial action in early childhood by identifying that two, distinct emotional contexts influence the amount and type of prosocial behaviors that toddlers use to help others.
AB - Prosocial behavior is a highly heterogeneous construct, and young children use distinct prosocial actions in response to differing emotional needs of another person. This study examined whether toddlers’ prosocial responses differed in response to two understudied emotional contexts—whether or not children caused a victim’s distress and the specific emotion expressed by the victim. Toddlers (N = 86; Mage = 35 months) and their parent participated in two separate mishap paradigms in which parents feigned pain and sadness, respectively. Half of the sample was led to believe they had transgressed to cause their parent’s distress, whereas the other half simply witnessed parent distress as bystanders. Results indicated that toddlers were overall equally prosocial when they were transgressors compared to when they were bystanders and significantly more prosocial in response to sadness than pain. Toddlers were significantly more likely to use affection as transgressors than bystanders, information seeking as bystanders than transgressors, and affection in response to pain than sadness. All children used greater helping in response to sadness than pain, and this was especially true when they were bystanders. Findings add to mounting evidence of the complexity of prosocial action in early childhood by identifying that two, distinct emotional contexts influence the amount and type of prosocial behaviors that toddlers use to help others.
KW - Prosocial behavior
KW - apology
KW - emotional context
KW - parent–child interaction
KW - reparative behavior
KW - transgression
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082184937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0165025420912007
DO - 10.1177/0165025420912007
M3 - Article
C2 - 33758446
AN - SCOPUS:85082184937
SN - 0165-0254
VL - 44
SP - 551
EP - 556
JO - International Journal of Behavioral Development
JF - International Journal of Behavioral Development
IS - 6
ER -