TY - JOUR
T1 - Elotuzumab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma
T2 - final phase 2 results from the randomised, open-label, phase 1b–2 dose-escalation study
AU - on behalf of the 1703 study investigators
AU - Richardson, Paul G.
AU - Jagannath, Sundar
AU - Moreau, Philippe
AU - Jakubowiak, Andrzej J.
AU - Raab, Marc S.
AU - Facon, Thierry
AU - Vij, Ravi
AU - White, Darrell
AU - Reece, Donna E.
AU - Benboubker, Lotfi
AU - Zonder, Jeffrey
AU - Tsao, L. Claire
AU - Anderson, Kenneth C.
AU - Bleickardt, Eric
AU - Singhal, Anil K.
AU - Lonial, Sagar
N1 - Funding Information:
PGR reports serving on the advisory committee for Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celgene. SJ reports consulting for Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celgene. AJJ reports institutional funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb for support of clinical trial conduct; and personal fees (advisory board, consultancy, speaking, and honoraria) from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Millennium, Novartis, Onyx, SkylineDx, Karyopharm, and Sanofi-Aventis. TF reports personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celgene. RV reports consulting for Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celgene. DW reports grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, and grants or personal fees from Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Amgen, and Takeda. DER reports consulting fees from Celgene and Janssen, and fees for lectures including speakers' bureaus from Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, and Amgen. LB reports research honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Millennium, Onyx Therapeutics, and Lilly; and consultancy, advisory board membership, travel expenses, and research honoraria for and from Celgene. JZ reports research funding from Celgene, serves on the data and safety monitoring committee for Pharmacyclics consultancy, and reports personal fees (steering committee, consultancy, and advisory board participation) from Celgene, Prothena, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Onclave, and Array Biopharma. LCT and AKS report employment at AbbVie Biotherapeutics. KCA reports consulting for Celgene, Millennium, Gilead, Sanofi-Aventis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and serving as scientific founder of Oncopep and Acetylon. EB reports employment at Bristol-Myers Squibb. SL reports personal fees (consultancy or advisory role) for Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Onyx, and Janssen. PM and MSR declare no competing interests.
Funding Information:
This study was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb in collaboration with AbbVie Biotherapeutics (Redwood City, CA, USA). We thank all the patients, their families, and the investigators who are participating in this study. Analysis production and validation were done by Pingping Xia and Qin Pan, respectively, at AbbVie Biotherapeutics. Medical writing support and editorial assistance was provided by Kate Rees and Carol Cooper, respectively, at Caudex (Oxford, UK) and funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb. The support was given under the direction of, and with input from, the authors at all stages.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - Background Elotuzumab, an immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody targeting signalling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) family member 7 (SLAMF7), selectively kills SLAMF7-expressing myeloma cells through direct activation and engagement of the innate immune system, and thus might have clinical benefit in the treatment of myeloma. In phase 1 of this phase 1b–2 study, 82% of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who were given elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone achieved an overall response. Here we report the final phase 2 results. Methods We did this randomised, multicentre, open-label, dose-escalation study (1703) at 17 hospitals in the USA, Canada, France, and Germany. Patients aged at least 18 years with confirmed, relapsed multiple myeloma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2, and one to three previous therapies but no previous lenalidomide were eligible for phase 2. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to either 10 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg intravenous elotuzumab plus oral lenalidomide (25 mg) and dexamethasone (40 mg). We stratified patients on the basis of the number of previous therapies (one versus two or three), and status of previous treatment with immunomodulatory drugs (yes or no), and used permuted block randomisation with a block size of four. Treatment was given in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred (elotuzumab was given on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for cycles 1 to 2 and days 1 and 15 for subsequent cycles; lenalidomide was given on days 1–21 and dexamethasone once per week). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population, and safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drugs. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00742560. Findings Between Jan 4, 2010, and Dec 21, 2010, we recruited and randomly assigned 73 patients to elotuzumab (36 to 10 mg/kg, 37 to 20 mg/kg). At data cutoff (Jan 16, 2014), 13 patients remained on treatment (six on 10 mg/kg, seven on 20 mg/kg). 61 (84%) patients achieved an objective response (33 [92%] with 10 mg/kg, 28 [76%] with 20 mg/kg); 31 (42%) a very good partial response (17 [47%] with 10 mg/kg, 14 [38%] with 20 mg/kg); and 20 (27%) a partial response (10 [28%] with 10 mg/kg, 10 [27%] with 20 mg/kg). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were diarrhoea (48 [66%]), muscle spasms (45 [62%]), and fatigue (41 [56%]). 57 (78%) patients had grade 3–4 events, the most common of which were lymphopenia (15 [21%]) and neutropenia (14 [19%]). Three deaths occurred, none related to the study drugs. Interpretation Elotuzumab combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma showed acceptable safety and efficacy that seems better than that previously noted with lenalidomide and dexamethasone only. Phase 3 trials are in progress. Funding Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie Biotherapeutics.
AB - Background Elotuzumab, an immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody targeting signalling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM) family member 7 (SLAMF7), selectively kills SLAMF7-expressing myeloma cells through direct activation and engagement of the innate immune system, and thus might have clinical benefit in the treatment of myeloma. In phase 1 of this phase 1b–2 study, 82% of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who were given elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone achieved an overall response. Here we report the final phase 2 results. Methods We did this randomised, multicentre, open-label, dose-escalation study (1703) at 17 hospitals in the USA, Canada, France, and Germany. Patients aged at least 18 years with confirmed, relapsed multiple myeloma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2, and one to three previous therapies but no previous lenalidomide were eligible for phase 2. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to either 10 mg/kg or 20 mg/kg intravenous elotuzumab plus oral lenalidomide (25 mg) and dexamethasone (40 mg). We stratified patients on the basis of the number of previous therapies (one versus two or three), and status of previous treatment with immunomodulatory drugs (yes or no), and used permuted block randomisation with a block size of four. Treatment was given in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred (elotuzumab was given on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for cycles 1 to 2 and days 1 and 15 for subsequent cycles; lenalidomide was given on days 1–21 and dexamethasone once per week). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population, and safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drugs. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00742560. Findings Between Jan 4, 2010, and Dec 21, 2010, we recruited and randomly assigned 73 patients to elotuzumab (36 to 10 mg/kg, 37 to 20 mg/kg). At data cutoff (Jan 16, 2014), 13 patients remained on treatment (six on 10 mg/kg, seven on 20 mg/kg). 61 (84%) patients achieved an objective response (33 [92%] with 10 mg/kg, 28 [76%] with 20 mg/kg); 31 (42%) a very good partial response (17 [47%] with 10 mg/kg, 14 [38%] with 20 mg/kg); and 20 (27%) a partial response (10 [28%] with 10 mg/kg, 10 [27%] with 20 mg/kg). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were diarrhoea (48 [66%]), muscle spasms (45 [62%]), and fatigue (41 [56%]). 57 (78%) patients had grade 3–4 events, the most common of which were lymphopenia (15 [21%]) and neutropenia (14 [19%]). Three deaths occurred, none related to the study drugs. Interpretation Elotuzumab combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma showed acceptable safety and efficacy that seems better than that previously noted with lenalidomide and dexamethasone only. Phase 3 trials are in progress. Funding Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie Biotherapeutics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964968270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00197-0
DO - 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00197-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 26686406
AN - SCOPUS:84964968270
SN - 2352-3026
VL - 2
SP - e516-e527
JO - The Lancet Haematology
JF - The Lancet Haematology
IS - 12
ER -