Efficacy of Subsequent Treatments After Disease Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer

Lis Victoria Ravani, Pedro Calomeni, Maysa Vilbert, Thiago Madeira, Ming Wang, Daxuan Deng, Laura Testa, Renata Colombo Bonadio, Katherine Clifton, Seth A. Wander, Maryam Lustberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSECyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard of care in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (aBC). Yet, disease progression remains common. In the absence of established postprogression sequencing guidelines, we conducted a pooled analysis of Kaplan-Meier (KM)-derived patient data to assess the efficacy of subsequent treatment options after disease progression on CDK4/6i therapy.METHODSWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and conference proceedings for randomized trials and cohort studies published from 2016 to December, 2023. Studies assessing subsequent treatment postprogression on CDK4/6i in patients with HR+ HER2- aBC were included. We performed a pooled analysis of KM-derived individual patient data. Outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This study is registered in PROSPERO, CRD42023491090.RESULTSOf 12,895 identified records, 18 studies comprising 4,899 patients were included. Maintaining treatment with a CDK4/6i plus ET post-CDK4/6i progression was associated with longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.70]; P <.01) and prolonged OS (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.77]; P <.01) compared with ET monotherapy. The PFS benefit was seen in both continuing the previous CDK4/6i (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56 to 0.79]; P <.01) and switching to a different CDK4/6i (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.85]; P <.01). Subsequent therapy with everolimus plus ET achieved similar PFS (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.35]; P =.35) and significantly shorter OS (HR, 1.52; [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.90], P <.01) as compared with ET monotherapy.CONCLUSIONThis extensive data pool suggests significant benefit of CDK4/6i regimens after disease progression as compared with ET monotherapy. Our data also support current guideline recommendations of ET-based therapies over chemotherapy for treatment sequencing.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere00649
JournalJCO Oncology Practice
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy of Subsequent Treatments After Disease Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this