Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy for Difficult Biliary Stones

Olaya I. Brewer Gutierrez, Noor L.H. Bekkali, Isaac Raijman, Richard Sturgess, Divyesh V. Sejpal, Hanaa D. Aridi, Stuart Sherman, Raj J. Shah, Richard S. Kwon, James L. Buxbaum, Claudio Zulli, Wahid Wassef, Douglas G. Adler, Vladimir Kushnir, Andrew Y. Wang, Kumar Krishnan, Vivek Kaul, Demetrios Tzimas, Christopher J. DiMaio, Sammy HoBret Petersen, Jong Ho Moon, B. Joseph Elmunzer, George J.M. Webster, Yen I. Chen, Laura K. Dwyer, Summant Inamdar, Vanessa B. Patrick, Augustin Attwell, Amy Hosmer, Christopher Ko, Attilio Maurano, Avik Sarkar, Linda J. Taylor, Martin H. Gregory, Daniel S. Strand, Ali Raza, Shivangi Kothari, Jessica P. Harris, Nikhil A. Kumta, Amar Manvar, Mark D. Topazian, Yun Nah Lee, Clayton M. Spiceland, Arvind J. Trindade, Majidah A. Bukhari, Omid Sanaei, Saowanee Ngamruengphong, Mouen A. Khashab

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Scopus citations


Background & Aims: It is not clear whether digital single-operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC) with electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy is effective in removal of difficult biliary stones. We investigated the safety and efficacy of D-SOC with electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy in an international, multicenter study of patients with difficult biliary stones. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 407 patients (60.4% female; mean age, 64.2 years) who underwent D-SOC for difficult biliary stones at 22 tertiary centers in the United States, United Kingdom, or Korea from February 2015 through December 2016; 306 patients underwent electrohydraulic lithotripsy and 101 (24.8%) underwent laser lithotripsy. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with technical failure and the need for more than 1 D-SOC electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy session to clear the bile duct. Results: The mean procedure time was longer in the electrohydraulic lithotripsy group (73.9 minutes) than in the laser lithotripsy group (49.9 minutes; P <.001). Ducts were completely cleared (technical success) in 97.3% of patients (96.7% of patients with electrohydraulic lithotripsy vs 99% patients with laser lithotripsy; P =.31). Ducts were cleared in a single session in 77.4% of patients (74.5% by electrohydraulic lithotripsy and 86.1% by laser lithotripsy; P =.20). Electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy failed in 11 patients (2.7%); 8 patients were treated by surgery. Adverse events occurred in 3.7% patients and the stone was incompletely removed from 6.6% of patients. On multivariable analysis, difficult anatomy or cannulation (duodenal diverticula or altered anatomy) correlated with technical failure (odds ratio, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–21.2; P =.02). Procedure time increased odds of more than 1 session of D-SOC electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.03; P <.001). Conclusions: In a multicenter, international, retrospective analysis, we found D-SOC with electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy to be effective and safe in more than 95% of patients with difficult biliary stones. Fewer than 5% of patients require additional treatment with surgery and/or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to clear the duct.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)918-926.e1
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 2018


  • Biliary Tract
  • Blockage
  • Choledocholithiasis
  • Gallstone


Dive into the research topics of 'Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy for Difficult Biliary Stones'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this