TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacité des techniques d’anesthésie régionale pour l’analgésie postopératoire chez les patientes subissant des chirurgies mammaires oncologiques majeures
T2 - une revue systématique et une méta-analyse en réseau d’études randomisées contrôlées
AU - Singh, Narinder Pal
AU - Makkar, Jeetinder Kaur
AU - Kuberan, Aswini
AU - Guffey, Ryan
AU - Uppal, Vishal
N1 - Funding Information:
NPS, JKM, and VU contributed to the conception of the study and drafted the protocol. NPS, JKM, and AK screened the studies and extracted the data. VU and NPS analyzed the results. VU and NPS drafted the manuscript. JKM, AK, and RG critically edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the study design and interpretation of data. The cost of the original illustration was covered by the Office of Research, Department of Anesthesia, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. We want to thank Professor Jennifer J. Szerb, Dalhousie University, for reviewing the manuscript and providing us with feedback on the presentation of the results. None. None. This submission was handled by Dr. Sheila Riazi, Associate Editor, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Background: The optimal regional technique to control pain after breast cancer surgery remains unclear. We sought to synthesize available data from randomized controlled trials comparing pain-related outcomes following various regional techniques for major oncologic breast surgery. Methods: In a systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched trials in PubMed, Embase Scopus, Medline, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar, from inception to 31 July 2020, for commonly used regional techniques. The primary outcome was the 24-hr resting pain score measured on a numerical rating score of 0–10. We used surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to establish the probability of an intervention ranking highest. The analysis was performed using the Bayesian random effects model, and effect sizes are reported as 95% credible interval (Crl). We conducted cluster-rank analysis by combining 24-hr pain ranking with 24-hr opioid use or incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: Seventy-nine randomized controlled trials containing 11 different interventions in 5,686 patients were included. The SUCRA values of the interventions for 24-hr resting pain score were continuous paravertebral block (0.83), serratus anterior plane block (0.76), continuous wound infusion (0.76), single-level paravertebral block (0.68), erector spinae plane block (0.59), modified pectoral block (0.49), intercostal block (0.45), multilevel paravertebral block (0.41), wound infiltration (0.33), no intervention (0.12), and placebo (0.08). When compared with placebo, the continuous paravertebral block (mean difference, 1.26; 95% Crl, 0.43 to 2.12) and serratus anterior plane block (mean difference, 1.12; 95% Crl, 0.32 to 1.9) had the highest estimated probability of decreasing 24-hr resting pain scores. Cluster ranking analysis combining 24-hr resting pain scores and opioid use showed that most regional analgesia techniques were more effective than no intervention or placebo. Nevertheless, wound infiltration and continuous wound infusion may be the least effective active interventions for reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Conclusion: Continuous paravertebral block and serratus anterior plane block had a high probability of reducing pain at 24 hr after major oncologic breast surgery. The certainty of evidence was moderate to very low. Future studies should compare different regional anesthesia techniques, including surgeon-administered techniques such as wound infiltration or catheters. Trials comparing active intervention with placebo are unlikely to change clinical practice. Study registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020198244); registered 19 October 2020.
AB - Background: The optimal regional technique to control pain after breast cancer surgery remains unclear. We sought to synthesize available data from randomized controlled trials comparing pain-related outcomes following various regional techniques for major oncologic breast surgery. Methods: In a systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched trials in PubMed, Embase Scopus, Medline, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar, from inception to 31 July 2020, for commonly used regional techniques. The primary outcome was the 24-hr resting pain score measured on a numerical rating score of 0–10. We used surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to establish the probability of an intervention ranking highest. The analysis was performed using the Bayesian random effects model, and effect sizes are reported as 95% credible interval (Crl). We conducted cluster-rank analysis by combining 24-hr pain ranking with 24-hr opioid use or incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results: Seventy-nine randomized controlled trials containing 11 different interventions in 5,686 patients were included. The SUCRA values of the interventions for 24-hr resting pain score were continuous paravertebral block (0.83), serratus anterior plane block (0.76), continuous wound infusion (0.76), single-level paravertebral block (0.68), erector spinae plane block (0.59), modified pectoral block (0.49), intercostal block (0.45), multilevel paravertebral block (0.41), wound infiltration (0.33), no intervention (0.12), and placebo (0.08). When compared with placebo, the continuous paravertebral block (mean difference, 1.26; 95% Crl, 0.43 to 2.12) and serratus anterior plane block (mean difference, 1.12; 95% Crl, 0.32 to 1.9) had the highest estimated probability of decreasing 24-hr resting pain scores. Cluster ranking analysis combining 24-hr resting pain scores and opioid use showed that most regional analgesia techniques were more effective than no intervention or placebo. Nevertheless, wound infiltration and continuous wound infusion may be the least effective active interventions for reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Conclusion: Continuous paravertebral block and serratus anterior plane block had a high probability of reducing pain at 24 hr after major oncologic breast surgery. The certainty of evidence was moderate to very low. Future studies should compare different regional anesthesia techniques, including surgeon-administered techniques such as wound infiltration or catheters. Trials comparing active intervention with placebo are unlikely to change clinical practice. Study registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020198244); registered 19 October 2020.
KW - erector spinae block
KW - modified pectoral nerve block
KW - oncologic breast surgery
KW - paravertebral block
KW - postoperative analgesia
KW - regional technique
KW - serratus anterior plane block
KW - wound infiltration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123944407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12630-021-02183-z
DO - 10.1007/s12630-021-02183-z
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35102494
AN - SCOPUS:85123944407
SN - 0832-610X
VL - 69
SP - 527
EP - 549
JO - Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
JF - Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
IS - 4
ER -