TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Skeletal Maturity on Fixation Techniques for Tibial Eminence Fractures
AU - Thome, Andrew P.
AU - O’Donnell, Ryan
AU - DeFroda, Steven F.
AU - Cohen, Brian H.
AU - Cruz, Aristides I.
AU - Fleming, Braden C.
AU - Owens, Brett D.
N1 - Funding Information:
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Funding for this study was obtained from the Rhode Island Orthopedic Foundation and the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS P30-GM122732 to the Bioengineering Core of the COBRE Centre for Skeletal Health and Repair). A.P.T. has received hospitality payments from Stryker. B.C. has received grant support from Arthrex and education payments from Medical Device Business Services and Smith & Nephew. B.D.F. has received education payments from Smith & Nephew, consulting fees from New York R&D Center for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, and royalties from Springer; he is a paid associate editor for The American Journal of Sports Medicine; and he is the founder of Miach Orthopaedics, and his spouse has an equity interest and serves as a consultant for the company. B.D.O. has received research support from Arthrex, Mitek, and MTF; consulting fees from DePuy, ConMed, MTF, Miach, and Vericel; royalties from ConMed; and honoraria from Vericel; he is a paid associate editor for The American Journal of Sports Medicine. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: Several fixation methods have been reported for the operative treatment of tibial eminence fractures. Previous biomechanical studies have demonstrated that suture fixation may be a stronger construct; however, the maturity status of these specimens was not scrutinized. Purpose: To examine if suture fixation remains a biomechanically superior fixation method to screw fixation in both skeletally mature and immature specimens. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Sixteen total matched porcine (Yorkshire) knees (8 skeletally immature knees and 8 skeletally mature knees) were procured, and a standardized tibial eminence fracture was created. In each age-matched group of knees, 4 knees underwent randomization to fixation with 2 screws while 4 knees were randomized to fixation using a dual-suture technique. Once fixation was complete, the specimens underwent cyclic loading (200 cycles) in the anteroposterior plane of the tibia and load-to-failure testing, both with the knee positioned at 30° of flexion. Relevant measurements were recorded, and data were analyzed. Results: Among mature specimens, load to failure was 1.9 times higher in the suture fixation group compared with the screw fixation group (1318.84 ± 305.55 vs 711.66 ± 279.95 N, respectively; P =.03). The load to failure was not significantly different between the groups in immature specimens (suture: 470.00 ± 161.91 N vs screw: 348.79 ± 102.46; P =.08). Conclusion: These findings suggest that suture fixation may represent a better construct choice for fixation of tibial eminence fractures in the skeletally mature population. However, in the skeletally immature population, fixation with screws or suture may be equivalent. Displacement after cyclic loading did not appear to differ by fixation method, nor did stiffness. Clinical Relevance: A stronger fixation construct may be beneficial and allow for earlier range of motion to help potentially decrease postoperative stiffness. Clinical studies are warranted to see if these results may be replicated in humans.
AB - Background: Several fixation methods have been reported for the operative treatment of tibial eminence fractures. Previous biomechanical studies have demonstrated that suture fixation may be a stronger construct; however, the maturity status of these specimens was not scrutinized. Purpose: To examine if suture fixation remains a biomechanically superior fixation method to screw fixation in both skeletally mature and immature specimens. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Sixteen total matched porcine (Yorkshire) knees (8 skeletally immature knees and 8 skeletally mature knees) were procured, and a standardized tibial eminence fracture was created. In each age-matched group of knees, 4 knees underwent randomization to fixation with 2 screws while 4 knees were randomized to fixation using a dual-suture technique. Once fixation was complete, the specimens underwent cyclic loading (200 cycles) in the anteroposterior plane of the tibia and load-to-failure testing, both with the knee positioned at 30° of flexion. Relevant measurements were recorded, and data were analyzed. Results: Among mature specimens, load to failure was 1.9 times higher in the suture fixation group compared with the screw fixation group (1318.84 ± 305.55 vs 711.66 ± 279.95 N, respectively; P =.03). The load to failure was not significantly different between the groups in immature specimens (suture: 470.00 ± 161.91 N vs screw: 348.79 ± 102.46; P =.08). Conclusion: These findings suggest that suture fixation may represent a better construct choice for fixation of tibial eminence fractures in the skeletally mature population. However, in the skeletally immature population, fixation with screws or suture may be equivalent. Displacement after cyclic loading did not appear to differ by fixation method, nor did stiffness. Clinical Relevance: A stronger fixation construct may be beneficial and allow for earlier range of motion to help potentially decrease postoperative stiffness. Clinical studies are warranted to see if these results may be replicated in humans.
KW - biomechanics
KW - knee
KW - pediatric sports medicine
KW - tibial eminence fracture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119345777&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/23259671211049476
DO - 10.1177/23259671211049476
M3 - Article
C2 - 34796240
AN - SCOPUS:85119345777
SN - 2325-9671
VL - 9
JO - Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 11
ER -