Effect of reverse shoulder arthroplasty humeral component retroversion on acromial strain

Michael O'Leary, Brett Haislup, Thomas Gillin, Pooyan Abbasi, Luke Austin, Melissa Wright, Anand M. Murthi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Acromion and scapular spine stress fractures can be catastrophic complications following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A variety of host, implant, and technical factors have been identified that increase the risk of this complication. The glenoid component in particular has been closely evaluated for its impact on rates of stress fractures following RSA. The goal of this biomechanical study is to evaluate if humeral stem version has an impact on acromion and scapular spine strain after RSA. Methods: Eight cadaveric specimens were tested on a custom dynamic shoulder frame. Commercially available RSA components were implanted with the humeral component inserted in 0° of retroversion. Acromion and scapular spine strain were measured at 0°, 30°, and 60° of abduction using strain rosettes secured to the acromion and scapular spine in the typical locations for Levy type II and type III stress fractures, respectively. The humeral stem was then removed and reimplanted in 30° of retroversion and the measurements were repeated. Student t test was performed to analyze the relationship between humeral stem version and acromion and scapular spine strain at various abduction angles. Results: Strain at the both the acromion and scapular spine were found to have no significant difference at any abduction angle when comparing 0° and 30° version of the humeral stem. With 0° and 30° versions pooled together, there is significantly lower acromion and scapular spine strain at 60° of abduction when compared to 0° of abduction (strain at 0° abduction – strain at 60° abduction: acromion 313.1 μꜪ; P = .0409, Scapular spine 304.9 μꜪ; P = .0407). There was no significant difference in strain at either location when comparing 0° of abduction to 30° of abduction and when comparing 30° of abduction to 60° of abduction. Conclusions: This biomechanical study found no significant difference in scapular spine and acromion strain after RSA when comparing variations in humeral stem version. There does appear to be lower strain at both the acromion and scapular spine at 60° of abduction when compared to 0° of abduction regardless of stem version.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S69-S74
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • acromial stress fracture
  • acromion
  • Basic Science Study
  • Biomechanics
  • Biomechanics
  • reverse shoulder arthroplasty
  • scapular spine
  • shoulder

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of reverse shoulder arthroplasty humeral component retroversion on acromial strain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this