Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation

Alan D. Brook, Thomas S. Ahrens, Robyn Schaiff, Donna Prentice, Glenda Sherman, William Shannon, Marin H. Kollef

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

799 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To compare a practice of protocol-directed sedation during mechanical ventilation implemented by nurses with traditional non-protocol- directed sedation administration. Design: Randomized, controlled clinical trial. Setting: Medical intensive care unit (19 beds) in an urban teaching hospital Patients: patients requiring mechanical ventilation (n = 321). Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either protocol- directed sedation (n = 162) or non-protocol-directed sedation (n = 159). Measurements and Main Results: The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 55.9 hrs (95% confidence interval, 41.0-90.0 hrs) for patients managed with protocol-directed sedation and 117.0 hrs (95% confidence interval, 96.0- 155.6 hrs) for patients receiving non-protocol-directed sedation. Kaplan- Meier analysis demonstrated that patients in the protocol-directed sedation group had statistically shorter durations of mechanical ventilation than patients in the non-protocol-directed sedation group (chi-square = 7.00, p = .008, log rank test; chi-square = 8.54, p = .004, Wilcoxon's test; chi-square = 9.18, p = .003, -2 log test). Lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (5.7 ± 5.9 days vs. 7.5 ± 6.5 days; p = .013) and hospital (14.0 ± 17.3 days vs. 19.9 ± 24.2 days; p < .001) were also significantly shorter among patients in the protocol-directed sedation group. Among the 132 patients (41.1%) receiving continuous intravenous sedation, those in the protocol- directed sedation group (n = 66) had a significantly shorter duration of continuous intravenous sedation than those in the non-protocol-directed sedation group (n = 66) (3.5 ± 4.0 days vs. 5.6 ± 6.4 days; p = .003). Patients in the protocol-directed sedation group also had a significantly lower tracheostomy rate compared with patients in the non-protocol-directed sedation group (10 of 162 patients [6.2%] vs. 21 of 159 patients [13.2%], p = .038). Conclusions: The use of protocol-directed sedation can reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation, the intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, and the need for tracheostomy among critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2609-2615
Number of pages7
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume27
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1999

Keywords

  • Critical care
  • Intensive care unit
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Outcomes
  • Sedation
  • Tracheostomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of a nursing-implemented sedation protocol on the duration of mechanical ventilation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this